暴力袭警事件的生成机制与治理路径 —— 基于583 份判决文书的实证分析
Formation Mechanism and Governance Path of Violent Police Attack — Empirical Analysis Based on 583 Judgment Instruments
- Authors:
- Keywords: Violent attack police; Police law enforcement authority; Police function; Police暴力袭警; 警察执法权威; 警察职能; 警察
- Abstract: The violent attack on police is historic and multiple, which is an urgent problem in our society. The empirical study of 583 judgment documents shows that the violence attack police incident is widely distributed in different ways, the consequences are serious, the target is concentrated, and it is urgent to standardize the governance. However, the current governance mechanism is not perfect, constraints are insufficient. On the basis of empirical research, this paper probes into the formation mechanism of violence attack police: prominent social contradictions and disputes, generalization of police functions, decline of police law enforcement authority, citizens’ selective law-abiding, non-standard police law enforcement, and low cost of attacking police. Based on this, there is a need for a comprehensive investigation of violent police attacks The specific governance paths include: constructing the mechanism of resolving contradictions, repositioning the police function, remolding the authority of police law enforcement, strengthening the publicity of law enforcement education, attaching importance to the construction of law enforcement standardization, and strengthening the punishment.暴力袭警事件具有历史性和多发性，是当前我国社会急需解决的问题。对583 份判决文书的实证研究表明：暴力袭警事件地域分布广泛、方式多样、后果严重、袭警对象集中，亟须规范化治理。然而，当前治理机制不完善，约束力度不足。在实证研究基础上，探究了暴力袭警生成机制主要有：社会矛盾纠纷突出、警察职能泛化、警察执法权威下降、法治信仰的缺失、警察执法不规范、袭警成本过低。基于此，需要对暴力袭警事件进行综合治理，具体治理路径有：构建化解矛盾分流机制、重新定位警察职能、重塑警察执法权威、加强法治教育宣传、重视执法规范化建设、强化惩治力度。
-
大数据侦查视域下的个人信息保护研究
Research on Personal Information Protection from the Perspective of Big Data Investigation
- Authors:
- Keywords: Big data investigation; Personal information; Investigative powers; Investigative procedure大数据侦查; 个人信息; 侦查权; 侦查程序
- Abstract: With the rapid development of science and technology, big data technology is widely used in the field of criminal investigation, and synthetic investigation, predictive investigation and active investigation become the advantages of big data investigation. The use of personal information in big data investigation is increasing day by day, which intensifies the security and protection of citizens’ personal information. At present, protection of citizens’ personal information in big data investigation faced with the following difficulties: the expansion of the subject of infringement, the universality of the object of infringement, the secrecy of the way of infringement, and the severity of the harmful consequences. The reasons are the lack of legal regulation, the limitation of internal prevention and control, the convenience of access channels, and the increase of leakage risk. Identification is necessary to strengthen the constitutional legal regulation, perfect the internal prevention and control mechanism, construct the pre-examination mechanism and establish the relief guarantee mechanism in the investigation of the inherent aggression of big data to citizens’ personal information.随着科学技术的迅猛发展，大数据技术广泛应用于刑事侦查领域，合成侦查、预测侦查、 主动侦查成为大数据侦查的优势所在。大数据侦查中个人信息的利用日益增多，加剧了公民个 人信息的安全与保护等问题。当前大数据侦查中公民的个人信息保护面临如下困境：侵权主体 的扩张性、侵权对象的广泛性、侵权方式的隐秘性以及危害后果的严重性。其原因具体为法律 规制的缺失、内部防控的限制、获取渠道的便捷、泄露风险的增加。鉴于大数据侦查对公民个 人信息固有的侵犯性，需要加强宪法法律规制、完善内部防控机制、构建事前审查机制、建立 救济保障机制。
-
重点基金项目
