Keywords:
Patent application; Chen Shouyuan effect; Patent law; Patent search guide; Science and technology; Invention and discovery
专利申请,陈寿元效应,专利法,专利查指南,科学与技术,发明与发现
Abstract:
This paper first introduces a series of patent applications based on
Chen Shouyuan effect (about 7 cases), all of which were rejected on the grounds
that Chen Shouyuan effect violated the laws of nature. The examination is based
on the clause of "Patent Examination Guide: 2-5-3.22, Application violates the
laws of nature. Four textbooks, Physics, Edited by Liu Yongsheng, Tsinghua
University Publishing House, are listed to draw a conclusion. The inventor
questioned the review opinions and reconsideration decisions from three
angles. (1) whether the examination process violates the patent law and whether
the examination authority exceeds the examination scope stipulated by the
patent law. (2) Whether the Chen Shouyuan effect violates the laws of nature.
(3) Whether the series of applications based on Chen Shouyuan effect meet
the authorization conditions of patent law. Dialogue with patent examination
experts on the above three issues.
该文首先介绍基于陈寿元效应的系列专利申请(约有7 件),皆被以陈寿元效应违背自然规律为由驳回。审查依据“专利审查指南:2-5-3.22,申请违背自然规律”条款。并列出《物理,刘永胜编,清华大学出版社》等四本教材为据得出结论。发明人对审查意见、复议决定提出质疑:(1)审查流程是否违背专利法、审查权限是否超出专利法规定的审查范围;(2)陈寿元效应多学科符合自然规律的解释;(3)基于陈寿元效应的系列申请满足专利法的授权条件。就以上三个问题与专利审查专家展开对话。。