Keywords:
Medical tort; Distribution of evidential burden; The liability principle
医疗纠纷;举证责任分配;规则原则
Abstract:
Disputes between doctors and patients are a prominent part of various social contradictions in our country [The Ministry of Health issued an emergency notice in June 2012, requiring health administrative departments at all levels to negotiate with the public security organs to send police offices to key medical institutions such as hospitals above the second level. ], the recent incidents of injured doctors have repeatedly made headlines and aroused widespread concern in the society. In simple terms, doctor-patient disputes are disputes between patients and the hospital and the attending doctor. If the patient is injured, he can file a civil compensation lawsuit on the basis of the right of claim. However, in practice, because medical disputes mostly involve professional medical knowledge and most Treatment is not public, so in medical litigation disputes, how to allocate the burden of proof is the focus of both the plaintiff and the defendant. To clarify the allocation of the burden of proof in medical disputes, and to improve the rules for the allocation of the burden of proof at the institutional level, can properly handle medical disputes. It is of great theoretical and practical significance to resolve disputes between patients and protect the interests of both doctors and patients.
医患纠纷是当前我国各种社会矛盾的突出部分 ,最近的伤医事件屡屡登上新闻头条,引发社会的广泛关注。医患纠纷简单解释来说就是患者和医院以及主治医生之间的纠纷,患者如果受到损害可以依照请求权基础提起民事赔偿之诉,但是在实务中因为医疗纠纷多涉及专业的医学知识且大多数治疗具有不公开性, 所以在医疗之诉纠纷中,举证责任如何分配是原被告双方共同关注的重点,厘清医疗纠纷中证明责任的分配问题,在制度层面完善举证责任分配规则,可以妥善处理医患纠纷,保护医患双方利益,具有重要的理论意义和现实意义。