国际中文开源期刊平台

袭警罪的规范分析与司法适用

Normative Analysis and Judicial Application of the Crime of Attacking Police

法学进展 / 2022,4(3)：111-123 / 2022-08-09 217 242

查看全文 下载文档

• 作者： 孙承程      苑嘉辉     
• 单位：

  上海政法学院刑事司法学院，上海

• 关键词： 袭警罪；妨害公务罪；刑法谦抑性
• Assault on police; Crime of obstructing public service; Modesty of criminal law
• 摘要： 袭警罪为《刑法修正案（十一）》的新设罪名，为了确保该新设罪名得以正确适用，本文将从规范层面和司法适用的角度予以分析：第一，该新设罪名保护的法益为警察的执法权和人身健康权，并且该双重法益中还存在主次区分；第二，对本罪的犯罪对象的范围应当进行“先实质后形式”的审查，从而将辅警纳入此罪的保护范围之内；第三，本罪的暴力行为的作用对象应当包含人员和警用物品；第四，本文将从教义学角度对本罪的相关概念如“暴力行为”“正在”“依 法执行职务”“严重危害人身安全”等进行解析，并且和妨害公务罪进行区别，以便更为精确合理地适用本罪名；第五，对于该罪的司法适用的展望，笔者认为，只有严格遵守审慎入罪、宽容出罪的态度，才能符合刑法谦抑性的要求，真正彰显司法的权威与公正。
• The crime of attacking the police is a new crime in the criminal law amendment (11). In order to ensure the correct application of the new crime, this paper will analyze it from the perspective of normative level and judicial application: first, the legal interests protected by the new crime are the police’s law enforcement power and personal health right, and there is a primary and secondary distinction in the dual legal interests; Second, the scope of the criminal object of this crime should be examined “substance before form”, so as to bring the auxiliary police into the protection scope of this crime; Third, the target of violence in this crime should include personnel and police goods; Fourth, from the perspective of dogma, this paper will analyze the relevant concepts of this crime, such as “violence”, “being”, “performing duties according to law”, “seriously endangering personal safety”, and distinguish it from the crime of obstructing public affairs, so as to apply this crime more accurately and reasonably; Finally, for the prospect of the judicial application of the crime, the author believes that only by strictly abiding by the attitude of prudent conviction and tolerance, can we meet the requirements of the modesty of criminal law and truly demonstrate the authority and justice of justice.
• DOI： https://doi.org/10.35534/al.0403011
• 引用： 孙承程，苑嘉辉．袭警罪的规范分析与司法适用［J］．法学进展，2022，4（3）：111-123．