International Open Access Journal Platform

强制猥亵罪基本犯客观行为的类型化认定

The Classification of Objective Behavior of the Basic Offender of Compulsory Indecency Crime

Advance in Law / 2024,6(4): 368-378 / 2024-09-29 303 1174

View Download PDF

• Authors: 庞子涵
• Information:

  北方工业大学，北京

• Keywords:
  Coercive means; Indecent acts; Interpretation of criminal law
  强制行为; 猥亵行为; 刑法解释
• Abstract: In the normative documents of our country, the criminal law and the law of public security administration use the word indecency at the same time. However, whether the meaning of the word indecency is the same in the two normative documents is controversial, which caused the boundary between illegal and criminal acts is very vague. In order to clarify the crime standard and maintain the modesty of the criminal law, we should exclude the subjective factors of the perpetrator and the victim from the objective behavior mode, clarify the scope of indecency in the crime of compulsory indecency, and clarify the specific behavior mode of compulsory means. Because of the wide range and large difference in coercive means and indecent acts, the fixed crime can not meet the needs of the protection of law interests. We should consider classifying behaviors and combine them in different ways to identify the behavior mode of the basic crime. 在我国规范性文件中，刑法与治安管理处罚法同时使用了猥亵一词，但猥亵一词在两个规范性文件中的含义是否相同存在争议，违法与犯罪行为的界限十分模糊。为明确入罪标准、保持刑法谦抑性，应以法规范为基础，排除在客观行为方式中考虑行为人与被害人的主观因素，厘清强制猥亵罪中猥亵的范围，明确强制手段的具体行为方式。由于强制手段与猥亵行为覆盖面广且轻重差距较大，规定固定的入罪行为不能满足保护法益的需要，应采取类型化的组合方式来认定基本犯的行为方式。
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.35534/al.0604030
• Cite: 庞子涵．强制猥亵罪基本犯客观行为的类型化认定［J］．法学进展，2024，6（4）：368-378.