International Open Access Journal Platform

认罪认罚案件证明标准研究

A Study on the Standard of Proof in the Case of Confession and Punishment

Advance in Law / 2025,7(1): 15-22 / 2024-12-20 119 184

View Download PDF

• Authors: 郑和     
• Information:

  北京市公安局昌平分局，北京

• Keywords: Standard of proof; The system of leniency for those who admit guilt and accept punishment; Reform of the judicial system 证明标准；认罪认罚从宽制度；司法制度改革
• Abstract: Since the formal implementation of the plea leniency system, there has been a debate on the standard of proof, and there are voices in both academic and practical circles advocating lowering the standard of proof for plea cases. Therefore, it is necessary to lower the standard of proof in plea cases. At the same time, a distinction should also be made between the facts of conviction and the facts of sentencing, and the standard of proof of the facts of conviction should not be changed due to changes in the type of case, while the standard of proof for sentencing facts may be appropriately lowered in cases of admitting guilt and accepting punishment. 认罪认罚从宽制度正式施行以来，对于其证明标准的讨论声就一直存在，学术界和实务界均有声音主张降低认罪认罚案件的证明标准，从实践层面来看过高的证明标准的确导致了庭审虚化和诉讼效率不高的问题。因此降低认罪认罚案件证明标准具有必要性。同时也应区分定罪事实与量刑事实，定罪事实的证明标准不应因案件类型的改变予以改变，而量刑事实在认罪认罚案件中则可将其证明标准适当降低。
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.35534/al.0701002
• Cite: 郑和．认罪认罚案件证明标准研究［J］．法学进展，2025，7（1）：15-22.