西南石油大学外国语学院
概括而言,“法律外交”是指以法治思维、通过法律手段和程序处理对外关系、国际事务的外交活动。
所谓“国际法治”,是指在国际社会中追求和推广法治原则、力图以法律规范为基础构建、调整合理公正国际秩序的理念。
显然,“法律外交”与“国际法治”之间高度重合,但又有所不同。
二者都有这样一些性质,如多边性——无论是法律外交还是国际法治,都需要多个国家、地区或国际组织的参与,通过制定、遵守共同的法律规则,以实现共同利益的最大化;合作性——以强烈的合作精神为驱动,求同存异,顾全大局,方能双赢;平等性——各方都有均等表达自己观点、维护自己权益的地位和份额,以求取得真正公平的结果;全球性——将法治的期待与实践超越国內体制的狭隘视野,以人类共同利益为基础,旨在促进世界范围的和平与繁荣。
具体而言,国际法治的基本原则是法律外交理论体系的重要内容,而国际法治的贯彻与执行又是法律外交实践体系的核心部分。可以说,法律外交是在国际法的基础上、推行国际法治理念,促进国际社会的有序、良性发展;而法律外交的广泛实践,又不断丰富、完善着国际法体系的形成。
就执行主体而言,如同国家是国际法的唯一主体,国际法治的倡导与执行者亦是以国家和国际组织为主,而法律外交的主体则呈多元化,包括外交部等部委、议会(全国人大)、司法部门、法学院校、研究机构、律师协会及法律专家学者等。
其实,国际法治的“法”应该特指“国际良法”,即预期得以遵行的国际规范都是好的规范,具有妥当的价值目标,如符合人本主义、和谐共存、可持续发展等价值要求,同时具有规范的法律形式 —— 严谨的逻辑和完善的体系。国际法治的“治”,是指其民主而透明的国际立法程序和严格而有效的国际法监督机制。所有这些,又是在国际社会上有效展开法律外交的基础和保证。
对于什么是“国际社会”有着不同的解释,有时常与“国际共同体”相混淆;现在一般认为,是指世界政治、经济的各行为主体为实现各自的利益、在频繁互动中所构成的一个整体,但其本质特征,应是罗马法谚所说的:“哪里有法,哪里就有社会”。显然,“法治”才是法律外交与国际法治的核心。
在国际社会中,各主权最大利益的扩展是无限的,而人类所共处的地球上的资源是有限的,为避免这种冲突重回丛林状态,以有效的法律外交进行国际斡旋和以严谨的国际法治进行法律制约,就至关重要。
作为国际社会中不断发展壮大的新兴大国,中国须不失时机地把握好法律外交与国际法治两个方面,并将其有效地统一起来,从而在当今世界百年未有之大变局中,发挥其独特的巨大作用。
In essence, “legal diplomacy” refers to diplomatic activities guided by rule-of-law thinking, employing legal means and procedures to manage foreign relations and international affairs.
The term “international rule of law” denotes the concept of pursuing and promoting rule-of-law principles within the international society, aiming to establish and adjust a reasonable and just international order based on legal norms.
Clearly, there is a significant overlap between “legal diplomacy” and the “international rule of law”, though they are not entirely synonymous.
Both share certain fundamental characteristics: Multilateralism — whether in legal diplomacy or the international rule of law, participation by multiple states, regions, or international organizations being essential to formulate and uphold common legal rules that maximize shared interests; Cooperativeness — driven by a strong spirit of collaboration, seeking common ground while shelving differences and bearing in mind the overall situation to achieve win-win outcomes; Equality — all parties enjoying equal status and the right to express their views and safeguard their interests, aiming for genuine fairness; and Universality — rooted in the common interests of humanity, seeking to transcend narrow domestic perspectives and promote peace and prosperity on a global scale.
Specifically, the fundamental principles of the international rule of law constitute an important component of the theoretical framework underpinning legal diplomacy, while the implementation and enforcement of the international rule of law form the core of the practical system of legal diplomacy. Legal diplomacy, grounded in international law, advances the vision of the international rule of law and fosters the orderly and sound development of the international society. Conversely, the extensive practice of legal diplomacy continually enriches and refines the international legal system.
As for actors responsible for implementation, just as states remain the primary subjects of international law, states and international organizations principally advocate and enforce the international rule of law. In contrast, legal diplomacy involves a more diverse range of actors, including ministries such as the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, legislatures (the National People’s Congress), judicial departments, law schools, research institutions, bar associations, and legal experts and scholars.
In fact, the “law” in the international rule of law specifically refers to “sound international law”—norms expected to be followed as they embody positive values such as humanism, harmonious coexistence, and sustainable development, and which possess normative legal form characterized by rigorous logic and a coherent system. The “rule” component denotes a democratic and transparent international legislative process, supported by strict and effective supervisory mechanisms for monitoring compliance with international law. Collectively, these elements provide the foundation and guarantee for the effective practice of legal diplomacy within the international society.
There are varying interpretations of the term “international society”, and it is sometimes confused with the concept of “international community”. Generally, the international society refers to the collective of political and economic actors worldwide interacting frequently to pursue their respective interests. Its defining essence, as a Roman law maxim states, is that “Where there is society, there is law” Thus, the “rule of law” is at the core of both legal diplomacy and the international rule of law.
In today’s international society, while sovereign actors pursue their maximal interests without inherent limits, the Earth’s resources are finite. To prevent a return to a law-of-the-jungle situation, it is essential to conduct international mediation through effective legal diplomacy and to impose legal constraints via the rigorous international rule of law.
As an emerging major power continuously growing within the international society, China must seize the opportunity to properly manage both legal diplomacy and the international rule of law and to achieve their effective integration, thereby playing a unique and significant role amid the profound global changes unseen in a century.