International Open Access Journal Platform

我国司法鉴定发展问题研究

Research on the Development of Forensic Expertise in China

Criminal Justice Science & Governance / 2020,1(1): 42-50 / 2020-07-13 1139 1415

View Download PDF

• Authors: 胡向阳¹²     
• Information:

  1. 中南财经政法大学刑事司法学院，武汉；
  2. 司法鉴定技术应用与社会治理学科创新基地，武汉

• Keywords: Forensic expertise; Existing problems; Reform suggestions 司法鉴定；存在问题；改革建议
• Abstract: Forensic expertise is one of the most widely used methods of judicial proof. Most of the evidence, especially the material evidence, in the litigation activities need to be examined and identified by the forensic experts by using modern science and technology and methods, to judge the special issues involved in the litigation, and then put forward the judicial expertise opinions. The construction and improvement of judicial expertise system plays an extremely important role in promoting judicial justice, resolving conflicts and disputes, safeguarding the legitimate rights and interests of citizens and social harmony and stability. This paper focuses on the development of Forensic Science in China since the promulgation of “The decision on the management of forensic expertise” in 2005, and the existing problems, such as the disunity of judicial expertise system, the non neutrality of institutions, the imbalance of resource allocation, the excessive marketization, the imperfection of laws and regulations, and the lack of scientific and technological research, etc., and puts forward reform suggestions to adapt to the judicial expertise Identification management needs to be incorporated into the construction of public legal service system. 司法鉴定是使用最广泛的一种司法证明方法。诉讼活动中大多数的证据、尤其是物 证都需要司法鉴定人运用现代科学技术和方法进行检验鉴定，并就诉讼涉及的专门性问题进 行判断进而提出司法鉴定意见。司法鉴定制度的构建与完善，对促进司法公正、化解矛盾纠纷、 维护公民合法权益及社会和谐稳定具有极其重要的作用。本文着重探讨了 2005 年《关于司法 鉴定管理问题的决定》颁布以来我国司法鉴定的发展现状及存在的司法鉴定体制不统一、机 构不中立、资源配置不均衡、过度市场化、法规不健全、司法鉴定理论和科学技术研究不足 等方面的问题，并提出了改革建议，以适应将司法鉴定管理纳入公共法律服务体系建设的需要。
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.35534/cjsg.0101003
• Cite: 胡向阳．我国司法鉴定发展问题研究［J］．刑事司法科学与治理，2020，1（1）．：42-50．
  https://doi.org/10.35534/cjsg.0101003