Keywords:
Opinion of administrative appraisal; Criminal justice; Evidence
行政鉴定意见;刑事司法;证据
Abstract:
Whether the administrative appraisal opinions collected by administrative agencies in the process of
law enforcement or case handling can be used as evidence in criminal proceedings. This is a controversial issue
that has a greater impact on judicial practice. The Criminal Procedure Law of the People’ s Republic of China
(2018 Amendment) and its related judicial interpretations do not make clear provisions on this issue. Although
in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Criminal Procedure Rules of the People’ s Procuratorate in
2019 and the Provisions on the Procedures for the Handling of Criminal Cases by Public Security Organs in
2012, administrative expertise can be used as evidence in criminal proceedings, the current academic research
on this issue is still It is relatively rare, and there are few discussions on how to use administrative appraisal
opinions in criminal justice, and there is a lack of empirical data support. In view of this, the author will use 300
judicial case documents from the Peking University Magic Database as a sample to conduct an empirical study
on the application of administrative appraisal opinions in criminal justice. The author’s expectation is: through
this research, we can roughly discover the overall characteristics and status of the application of administrative
appraisal opinions in criminal justice, and discuss the current main problems, and then try to put forward some
ideas for improvement.
行政机关在执法或办案过程中收集的行政鉴定意见,在刑事诉讼中是否可以作为证据使用。这是一个颇具争议且对司法实践影响较大的问题。《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法(2018修正)》及其相关司法解释并未对此问题作出明确规定。虽然按照2019年《人民检察院刑事诉讼规则》、2012年《公安机关办理刑事案件程序规定》相关条款,行政鉴定意见可以在刑事诉讼中作为证据使用,但目前理论界对此问题的相关学术研究还比较少,对于刑事司法应如何使用行政鉴定意见等问题也少有论及,且缺乏实证资料的支撑。有鉴于此,笔者将以300份来自北大法宝数据库的司法案例文书为样本,对行政鉴定意见在刑事司法中的应用状况进行实证研究。笔者的期待是:通过本次研究,可以大致发现行政鉴定意见应用在刑事司法中所呈现的总体特征与状态,并探讨当前存在的主要问题,进而尝试提出一些改进思路。