国际中文开源期刊平台

鉴定意见确定性要求和实践的冲突及调适路径

Conflict and Adaptation Path between the Certainty Requirements of Appraisal Opinions and Practices

刑事司法科学与治理 / 2023,4(2)：13-17 / 2023-12-14 81 76

查看全文 下载文档

• 作者： 荣申燕     
• 单位：

  华东政法大学刑事法学院，上海

• 关键词： 民事诉讼；司法鉴定；鉴定意见；确定性
• Civil litigation; Judicial appraisal; Expert opinion; Certainty
• 摘要： 民事诉讼中对于一些专门性问题的判断依赖于鉴定意见，但是在诉讼实践中，法官和鉴定人就鉴定意见的明确性存在分歧。人民法院颁布的《最高人民法院关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》和《关于人民法院民事诉讼中委托鉴定审查工作若干问题的规定》都对鉴定意见的明确性做了规定。本文基于这两份规定，从司法鉴定的角度，探讨不确定性鉴定意见的合理性以及对两份规定中“不确定”和“不明确”的理解，并浅析法官和鉴定人对于鉴定意见明确性之间冲突产生的原因并提出相应解决方案。
• In civil litigation, the judgment of some specialized issues relies on appraisal opinions, but in litigation practice, judges and evaluators have differences on the clarity of appraisal opinions. The Several Provisions of the Supreme People’s Court on Evidence in Civil Proceedings and the Provisions on Several Issues Concerning the Entrustment of Appraisal Review Work in Civil Litigation by People’s Courts promulgated by the people’s courts both provide for the clarity of appraisal opinions. Based on these two provisions, this paper discusses the reasonableness of uncertainty appraisal opinions and the understanding of “uncertainty” and “unclear” in the two provisions from the perspective of judicial appraisal, and briefly analyzes the reasons for the conflict between judges and evaluators on the clarity of appraisal opinions and gives corresponding solutions.
• DOI： https://doi.org/10.35534/cjsg.0402002
• 引用： 荣申燕．鉴定意见确定性要求和实践的冲突及调适路径［J］．刑事司法科学与治理，2023，4（2）：13-17．