Public legal service; Judicial expertise; Integrated development; Fairness and justice
公共法律服务; 司法鉴定; 融合发展; 公平正义
Abstract:
In response to public demand, public legal service aims to provide comprehensive and convenient legal support and assistance, while judicial expertise represents the legal authority granted by the state in the judicial field to carry out fair and rigorous judicial authentication activities. There are significant differences between the two in terms of their rights and resources. This situation highlights the need for the integrated development of both systems to address the imbalance in resource allocation, enhance the public’s legal literacy, and improve the fairness and efficiency of the legal service system. From the unique perspective of public legal services, this paper deeply analyzes the necessity, current practice and feasible path selection of the integrated development of public legal services and judicial expertise. By thoroughly reviewing and analyzing the existing challenges within the judicial authentication system, the urgent needs and practical significance of integrating the two are underscored. Based on these insights, a series of concrete measures are proposed to promote their integrated development, so as to build a more coordinated, efficient, and fair legal service system.
公共法律服务系立足于社会公众需求,旨在提供全面、便捷的法律支持与援助;而司法鉴定,则是在司法领域内,凭借国家赋予的法定权威,执行公正、严谨的司法鉴定活动。两者在权利属性与服务资源方面存在显著差异,这一现状呼唤着两者的融合发展,以期减少资源分配的不均衡,提升公众法律素养,并强化法律服务体系的公平性与效率性。从公共法律服务的独特视角出发,深入剖析公共法律服务与司法鉴定融合发展的必要性、当前实践状况及可行的路径选择。通过对现有司法鉴定体系中存在的诸多问题进行细致梳理与剖析,揭示两者融合发展的迫切需求与现实意义。在此基础上,提出一系列旨在促进两者融合发展的具体措施,旨在构建一个更加协同、高效且公平的法律服务体系。