International Open Access Journal Platform

刑事涉案财物全流程监督的路径研究

Research on the Pathways for Whole-Process Supervision of Property Involved in Criminal Cases

吴风¹³, 汪辉², 何豪²

Criminal Justice Science & Governance / 2026,7(1): 91-97 / 2026-07-14 25 2

View Download PDF

• Information:

  1．中南财经政法大学刑事司法学院，武汉；
  2．罗田人民检察院，黄冈；
  3．司法鉴定技术应用与社会治理学科创新基地，武汉

• Keywords:
  Definition of property involved in the case; Legal supervision; Connection mechanism
  涉案财物界定; 法律监督; 衔接机制
• Abstract: With the deepening of judicial reforms in China, the disposal of property involved in criminal cases has received increasing attention. The recovery of illicit assets and compensation for losses not only directly affect the public’s recognition of judicial fairness, but also serve as an important indicator of the modernization level of criminal governance capabilities. Therefore, it is essential to systematically enhance judicial efficiency by clarifying the scope of property involved in cases and establishing a comprehensive legal supervision mechanism. On the one hand, based on Article 64 of the Criminal Law and relevant judicial interpretations, property involved in criminal cases can be categorized into four types according to its source, purpose, ownership status, and degree of circulation restrictions: illegal gains, property of the offender used for criminal purposes, the victim’s property, and prohibited items. Furthermore, the scope of case-related property should be appropriately expanded based on the characteristics of the constitution of crimes, so as to provide a clear basis for asset recovery and loss compensation efforts at various litigation stages. On the other hand, by strengthening legal supervision and improving inter-agency collaboration mechanisms, effective oversight can be achieved throughout the entire process from case filing, investigation, and prosecution, to trial and execution. For example, during the case filing and investigation stages, prosecutorial supervision should be enhanced to advance the verification and recovery of involved property. Transfer and linkage procedures should be optimized to standardize the disposal of property in cases accepted, prosecuted, or not prosecuted by procuratorial organs. Additionally, the supervision mechanisms for trial and execution should be improved to facilitate the orderly connection of judgment delivery, transfer, case registration for execution and feedback procedures, thereby ensuring the efficient and lawful disposal of case-related property. In summary, by clearly defining the scope of involved property and establishing a seamless supervision chain, the standardization of handling such property can be effectively enhanced. This will not only strengthen judicial credibility, but also achieve the unity of political, social, and legal effects. 随着我国司法改革的深化，刑事涉案财物处置工作日益受到重视。追赃挽损不仅直接关系人民群众对司法公正的认可度，也是衡量犯罪治理能力现代化水平的重要标尺。为此，有必要从明确涉案财物范围与健全的全流程法律监督机制两方面入手来系统提升司法效能。一方面，基于《刑法》第六十四条及相关司法解释，刑事涉案财物可依据其来源、用途、权属状态及流通限制程度，划分为四类：违法所得、供犯罪所用的本人财物、被害人财物、违禁品。此外，还可结合犯罪构成特点对涉案财物范围做必要扩充，从而为各诉讼环节的追赃挽损工作提供清晰依据。另一方面，通过强化法律监督和完善跨单位协作机制，在立案、侦查、起诉、审判与执行全流程中实现有效监督。例如，在立案侦查环节上强化检察监督，推动涉案财物查证与挽损工作前移；优化移送衔接程序，规范检察机关受理、提起公诉与不起诉案件中的财物处置衔接；完善审判与执行环节的监督机制，推动判决送达、移交、立案执行及反馈程序的有序衔接，确保涉案财物依法高效处置。因此，通过明确范围界定与贯通监督链条，能够有效提升涉案财物处理的规范化水平，增强司法公信力，实现政治效果、社会效果与法律效果的统一。
• DOI: 10.35534/cjsg.0701009
• Cite: 吴风，汪辉，何豪．刑事涉案财物全流程监督的路径研究［J］．刑事司法科学与治理，2026，7（1）：91-97．