检察机关技术性证据审查：实践检视与理论反思
Technical Evidence Review by Prosecutors: Practical Review and Theoretical Reflection
- Authors:
- Keywords: The procuratorial organs; Technical evidence; Examine检察机关; 技术性证据; 审查
- Abstract: In the increasingly emphasizing trial centered trial mode, in order to cope with the constantly emergingtechnical evidence in practice and fully play the role of procuratorial supervision, the review of technical evidenceby procuratorial organs is playing an increasingly important role. It is not difficult to find that in judicial practice,there are practical difficulties in the examination of technical evidence by procuratorial organs, such as unevendistribution of examination power and too single examination types, by reviewing 409 criminal judgmentsfrom 2018 to 2022 with the keyword “technical evidence” as the full text. The main reason for this is due tothe alienation of the function of the review power, incomplete review standard system, and other practicaland institutional difficulties. In this regard, it is necessary to improve the technical evidence review plan byemphasizing the grassroots configuration of technical evidence review and adhering to the intelligent constructionof technical evidence review, in order to achieve more feasible practice, sound system, and more complete theory.At the same time, to improve the efficiency of the technical evidence review work of the procuratorial organs, it isalso necessary to strengthen procuratorial supervision and improve ideological awareness.在日益强调以庭审为中心的审判模式下，为了应对实践中层出不穷的技术性证据，充分发挥检察监督功能，检察机关技术性证据审查正扮演着日益重要的角色。梳理2018年至2022年409份以“技术性证据”为全文关键词的刑事判决书，不难发现，司法实践中检察机关技术性证据审查存在审查力量分布不均衡、审查类型过于单一化等实践困境。究其原因，主要是由于审查力量功能异化、审查标准体系不完备等现实及制度难题导致。对此，需要通过重视技术性证据审查的基层配置、坚持技术性证据审查的智慧化建设等方式加以完善，以期实践更加可行、制度更加健全、理论更加完备的技术性证据审查方案。同时，提高检察机关技术性证据审查工作效能，还需要加强检察监督，提高思想认识。
-
Funding
区块链存证技术的风险及防控研究——以电子签名笔迹鉴定为例
Research on the Risk and Prevention and Control of Blockchain Certificate Storage Technology —Take Handwriting Verification of Electronic Signature as an Example
- Authors:
- Keywords: Blockchain; Electronic signature handwriting; Judicial expertise; Identification区块链; 电子签名笔迹; 司法鉴定; 同一认定
- Abstract: As a product of the information technology era, blockchain certificate storage technology has been widely applied under the drive of big data. In order to meet the growing demand for electronic signature handwriting authentication in judicial practice, improve the reliability and efficiency of electronic signature handwriting authentication, and effectively improve the reliability of expert opinions in judicial activities, the introduction of blockchain technology into electronic signature handwriting authentication will be a new direction of technology and justice. A complete and safe identification system is built by keeping the electronic signature handwriting in three stages: the formation process, the implementation process of electronic signature handwriting identification, and the application process of electronic signature handwriting identification opinions. At the same time, the institutional, legal and technical risks faced by electronic signature handwriting authentication based on blockchain certificate storage technology should also be responded from the aspects of institutional supervision, legal clarity and technical specifications. Only in this way can we promote the integration and development of justice and technology.作为信息技术时代的产物，区块链存证技术在大数据驱动下得到普遍应用。为了满足司法实践中电子签名笔迹鉴定日益增长的需求，提高电子签名笔迹鉴定可靠性和效率，有效提升鉴定意见在司法活动中的可靠性，将区块链技术引入到电子签名笔迹鉴定活动中将会是技术与司法结合的新方向。通过对电子签名笔迹的形成过程、电子签名笔迹鉴定的实施过程以及电子签名笔迹鉴定意见的运用过程三阶段进行上链保存，构建完整、安全的鉴定系统。同时，对基于区块链存证技术的电子签名笔迹鉴定面临的制度、 法律及技术风险，也应从制度监管、法律明确及技术规范等层面予以回应。由此，才可促进司法与技术的融合发展。
-
