Abstract:
Technical evidence review is a part of the legal supervision function of the procuratorial organ, and
it is an inherent requirement of the procuratorial power. Carrying out technical evidence review can prevent
defective evidence from entering the court trial stage, effectively reducing the occurrence of wrong cases, and also be an important basis for follow-up works such as returning for supplementary investigation, re-identification or supplementary identification. In cybercrime cases, the review of electronic data is the focus and difficulty of technical evidence review work. In the current judicial practice, there are problems such as the inability of technical evidence review to form effective guidelines for investigation, weak correlation review, and weak awareness of core evidence among technical evidence reviewers. Therefore, under the premise of clarifying the legal nature of technical evidence review opinions, this paper aims to promote technical evidence review throughout the entire case, form a consensus review focus and review method, and absorb external technical forces to assist procuratorial organs in building a unified and shared technical evidence review talent pool and review platform with a view to improving the current state of electronic data review.
技术性证据审查是检察机关法律监督职能中的一部分,是检察权的内在要求,进行技术性证据审查能够阻断瑕疵证据进入庭审阶段,有效减少错案发生,同时也是对后续工作如退回补充侦查、重新或补充鉴定的重要依据。在网络犯罪案件中,对电子数据的审查是技术性证据审查工作中的重点与难点,当前司法实践存在着技术性证据审查无法对侦查形成有效指引、关联性审查力度弱以及技术性证据审查人员核心证据意识淡薄等问题。因此,本文旨在明确技术性证据审查意见法律属性的前提下,推进技术性证据审查贯穿全案,形成凝聚共识的审查重点与审查方式,同时吸收外部技术力量辅助检察机关构建起统一共享的技术性证据审查人才库和审查平台,以期改善电子数据审查的现状。