Keywords:
Cross-border telecom and network fraud; Investigation and interrogation; Big data investigation; Risk prevention and control
跨境电信网络诈骗;侦查讯问;大数据侦查;风险防控
Abstract:
In recent years, the telecom network fraud gang is basically located outside the country, which brings great difficulty to the public security organs. In the face of such crimes, the big data investigation of the public security organs shows the limitations of data acquisition and criminal proof. Therefore, the investigators need to find and prove the facts of the case through interrogation. However, the current interrogation work of the public security organs is faced with many difficulties, such as the structural defects of the knowledge age of interrogation talents, the contradiction of investigation fragmentation and the integration of interrogation work, the increasingly complicated crime mode of electric fraud cases, and the increasingly strengthened anti-interrogation ability of electric fraud elements. In view of this, the public security organs should improve the effectiveness of investigation and interrogation as soon as possible from several aspects of cultivating interrogation talents with multiple knowledge structure, strengthening the investigation cooperation of cross-border electric fraud cases, and formulating interrogation strategies and interrogation guidelines. At the same time, the public security organs should also pay attention to the prevention and control of the legal risks and evidence authenticity risks in the investigation and interrogation.
近年来,电信网络诈骗团伙基本盘踞在境外,给公安机关侦查取证带来极大的难度。对于此类犯罪,公安机关的大数据侦查表现出数据获取以及刑事证明的局限性。因此,侦查人员需要通过审讯来发现和证明案件事实。然而,当前公安机关的审讯工作面临审讯人才知识年龄的结构性缺陷、侦查片段化和审讯工作一体化矛盾、电诈案件的犯罪模式日趋复杂化、电诈分子的反审讯能力日趋强化等诸多困境。鉴于此,公安机关应当尽快从培养多元知识结构的审讯人才、加强跨境电诈案件的侦查协作、制定讯问策略和审讯指引等方面提高侦查讯问的效能。同时,公安机关也要注意防控侦查讯问中的法律风险和证据真实性风险。