International Open Access Journal Platform

论网络言论暴力行为的刑法规制

On the Criminal Law Regulation of Online Speech Violence

Criminal Justice Science & Governance / 2025,6(1): 88-96 / 2025-04-29 93 18

View Download PDF

• Authors: 潘宁
• Information:

  中南财经政法大学刑事司法学院，武汉

• Keywords:
  Online speech violence; Criminal law regulation; Criminal standard; System improvement
  网络言论暴力; 刑法规制; 入罪标准; 制度完善
• Abstract: Faced with the rapid increase in the number of online speech violence cases, there is no unified standard in China’s theoretical community for judging speech crimes. In order to regulate online speech violence through criminal law. We will now analyze and compare three judgment paths: The factual path, the normative path, and the synthesis path, and determine the most applicable judgment criteria. We believe that in the regulation of online speech crimes, it is necessary to seek a balance of various paths, advocate diversified expression of speech, promote inclusive and tolerant attitudes, and strengthen public information literacy education to cultivate people’s discernment ability, in order to better deal with false and misleading speech. For extremely heinous acts, based on existing theories, the criteria for criminalizing online speech violence are related to social harm, illegality, and responsibility. Regarding how to regulate online speech violence, we have drawn on the laws and regulations of various countries around the world and focused on analyzing and comparing the laws of Germany and the United States. The insights for China include the need to first establish a unified standard for the recognition of online speech, secondly, the government should become the regulatory body for online speech, and finally, conflict resolution should be based on rights and interests. 面对当前网络言论暴力案件数量的急速上升，我国理论界对于言论犯罪的判断却没有统一的标准。为了对网络言论暴力行为进行刑法规制，本文将对事实主义路径、规范主义路径、综合主义路径三种判断路径进行分析比较，以得出最适用的判断标准。本研究认为，在网络言论犯罪规制中，应当寻求各种路径的平衡，倡导多元化的言论表达，提倡包容和宽容的态度，同时加强公众的信息素养教育，培养人们的辨识能力，以更好地应对虚假和误导性的言论。对于极其恶劣的行为，结合现有学说，得出网络言论暴力行为的入罪标准与社会危害性、不法性和有责性有关。关于如何规制网络言论暴力行为，本文借鉴了世界各国的法律法规，并着重分析比较了德国与美国的法律，提出对我国的启示：首先，需要制定网络言论认定的统一标准；其次，政府应成为网络言论的监管主体；最后，要用权益衡量来解决冲突。
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.35534/cjsg.0601010
• Cite: 潘宁．论网络言论暴力行为的刑法规制［J］．刑事司法科学与治理，2025，6（1）：88-96．