International Open Access Journal Platform

“虚假信息型”网络寻衅滋事犯罪司法适用困境与出路

Dilemma and Way Out of Judicial Application of “False Information Type” Network Affray Crime

Criminal Justice Science & Governance / 2025,6(1): 49-56 / 2025-04-29 77 17

View Download PDF

• Authors: 王彦翔
• Information:

  北京师范大学法学院，北京

• Keywords:
  Cybercrime; Affray; False information; Judicial application; The risk of recidivism
  网络犯罪; 寻衅滋事; 虚假信息; 司法适用; 再犯风险
• Abstract: In the digital age, the problem of cybercrime is becoming increasingly severe. The “false information type” network affray crime is expanding at an accelerating rate. There is a lack of specific and unified legal application standards for this type of crime. In order to better address the numerous issues existing in the current judicial application of such crimes, this study focuses on the “false information type” network affray crime. Starting from the research status at home and abroad, it summarizes the characteristics of this type of crime, including strong concealment, low cost, rapid information dissemination, direct impact on real-life, and the trends of being organized and professionalized. Through the analysis of specific cases such as those of Qin Moumou and Zhong Moumou, the following four dilemmas in judicial application are summarized: The scope of false information, the determination of “serious disruption of public order”, the balance between illegal costs and the risk of recidivism, as well as the ambiguity of conviction and sentencing boundaries and the lack of standards. To cope with the above-mentioned dilemmas, six targeted measures are proposed in this study: Clarify the scope of false information and strictly distinguish false information from facts and opinions; construct a determination system for “serious disruption of public order”, comprehensively consider multiple factors and quantify the standards; increase illegal costs and reduce the risk of recidivism from the civil and administrative levels; Give play to the guiding role of legal interpretations and guiding cases; Construct a smart judicial element-based trial-assistance model to assist in judicial decision-making; Establish a multi-party participation supervision mechanism for collaborative governance among network platforms, regulatory authorities, and judicial organs, strengthen the supervision of key netizens, and prevent crimes. 在数字时代，网络犯罪问题日益严峻，“虚假信息型”网络寻衅滋事犯罪呈加速扩张态势。该类犯罪缺乏具体、统一的法律适用标准，为了更好解决目前该类犯罪司法适用中存在的诸多问题，本文聚焦“虚假信息型”网络寻衅滋事犯罪，从国内外研究现状出发，归纳总结该类犯罪隐蔽性强、成本低、信息扩散快且直接影响现实生活、组织化和职业化的特征。结合秦某某、钟某等具体案例分析，总结出以下四点司法适用困境：虚假信息范围、“公共秩序严重混乱”判定、违法成本与再犯风险平衡以及定罪量刑界限模糊、标准缺失。为应对以上困境，研究提出六点针对性措施：明确虚假信息范围，严格区分虚假信息与事实、意见；构建“公共秩序严重混乱”认定体系，综合考量多种因素量化标准；从民事、行政层面提升违法成本、降低再犯风险；发挥法律解释与指导性案例的指引作用；构建智慧司法要素式审判辅助模型，助力司法决策；建立网络平台、监管部门、司法机关协同共治的多方参与监管机制，加强对重点网民的监管并预防犯罪。
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.35534/cjsg.0601006
• Cite: 王彦翔．“虚假信息型”网络寻衅滋事犯罪司法适用困境与出路［J］．刑事司法科学与治理，2025，6（1）：49-56．