Current Views: 195612
Current Downloads: 235334
Subscribe to the latest published information from SCISCAN
生态书写视野下《天火》与《通往雨山的路》比较研究
A Comparative Study on Celestial Fire and The Way to Rainy Mountain from the Perspective of Ecological Writing
- Authors: 李怡文
-
Information:
华东理工大学，上海
- Keywords: Alai; Hollow Mountain; Navarre Scott Momaday; The Way to Rainy Mountain; Ecological writing 阿来；《天火》；纳瓦拉·斯科特·莫马戴；《通往雨山的路》；生态书写
- Abstract: The novel Hollow Mountain: Celestial Fire by Tibetan writer Alai and The Way to Rainy Mountain by Native American writer Navarre Scott Momaday are both classics in minority literature. From the perspective of ecological writing, this article employs Lu Shuyuan’s tripartite division theory to examine the natural, social, and spiritual ecological crises in the two works. In terms of natural ecology, the Tibetan people’s view of “the unity of gods and humans”, the Kiowa’s sun worship and natural beliefs are fading. In terms of social ecology, certain positions in Tibetan society are erased, but traditional culture is maintained, while the Kiowa’s oral tradition disappears with the passing of generations and the spread of English. In terms of spiritual ecology, both the Tibetan people and the Kiowa have experienced processes of collapse and recovery, with the former embracing reform while obtaining spiritual revival, and the latter emphasizing a retrace to historical memory. 藏族作家阿来的小说《天火》与美国印第安裔作家纳瓦拉·斯科特·莫马戴的作品《通往雨山的路》均为少数民族文学经典。本文在生态书写的视野下运用鲁枢元的三分法分析两部作品中的自然、社会和精神生态危机。自然生态方面，藏族人民“神人合一”的自然观、基奥瓦人的太阳崇拜和自然信仰受到冲击；社会生态方面，藏族的一些原始职能被淘汰，但传统文化得到了延续，而基奥瓦人的口述传统随祖辈逝去和英语普及逐渐消亡；精神生态方面，藏族人民和基奥瓦人都经历了从崩塌到恢复的过程，前者在接纳革新中获得精神重塑，后者强调对历史记忆的追溯。两部作品中的生态哲思为主流文化影响下的人们开拓了新的视野。
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.35534/lin.0603013
- Cite: 李怡文．生态书写视野下《天火》与《通往雨山的路》比较研究［J］．语言学，2024，6（3）：155-166．
