Current Views: 143521
Current Downloads: 123260
Leisure Sports and Health
ISSN Print:2710-0154
ISSN Online:2710-0162
Contact Editorial Office
Subscribe to the latest published information from SCISCAN
不同篮球鞋在纵跳中足底压力的差异性研究
Different Basketball Shoes in the Vertical Jump of Plantar Pressure Difference Research
- Authors: 伊超凡
-
Information:
湖北大学体育学院，武汉
- Keywords: Plantar pressure; Basketball shoes; Vertical jump; Plantar peak pressure 足底压力；篮球鞋；纵跳；足底压强峰值
- Abstract: Objective: to explore the difference of plantar pressure of basketball enthusiasts wearing three brand basketball shoes during shooting, and to analyze the influence of different basketball shoes on feet from the point of view of biomechanics. Methods: the plantar pressure distribution characteristics of eight basketball college students wearing three kinds of basketball shoes (NIKEKYRIE6, ADIDASDAME7, Li Ning ALLCITY8) were tested by using German NovelPedal-X plantar pressure test system. Results: there was no significant difference in the three parameters of the three basketball shoes (p>0.05), but there were differences in the three mechanical parameters of maximum ground reaction force, maximum pressure peak and force-time integral value. Research conclusion: NIKE basketball shoes have the best cushioning and protection performance, Li Ning basketball shoes take the second place, and ADIDAS basketball shoes are the worst. 本研究旨在通过比较不同类型篮球鞋之间的足底压力变化，以及各指标之间的相互作用，来深入了解它们对于篮球爱好者脚部健康和安全的影响。通过使用德国Novel Pedal-X足部压力检测系统，我们对八名拥有篮球专业背景的大学生进行了实验，他们穿着三款不同的篮球鞋（耐克欧文6、阿迪达斯利拉德7和李宁全城8），模拟了跳投下落时的脚部压力分布情况。结果：三款篮球鞋在整体上以及足底9区域的相关参数结果均无明显差异（p>0.05），在最大压强峰值、最大地面反作用力、力—时间积分值三个力学参数上的具体数值存在不同。研究结论：耐克篮球鞋在保护性与缓冲性方面最好，李宁鞋次之，阿迪达斯篮球鞋最差。
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.35534/lsh.0204016
- Cite: 伊超凡．不同篮球鞋在纵跳中足底压力的差异性研究［J］．休闲运动与健康，2022，2（4）：81-85．
