International Open Access Journal Platform

论客观的预备合并之诉

On the Objective Preliminary Combination’s Litigation

Progress in Social Sciences / 2021,3(2): 214-226 / 2021-04-27 641 788

View Download PDF

• Authors: 贺婷婷     
• Information:

  上海政法学院，上海

• Keywords: Objective combination; Preliminary combination; Chief litigation; preliminary litigation 客观合并；预备合并；主诉；备诉
• Abstract: The objective preliminary combination’s litigation is a very important part of the litigation’s combination system. Germany, Japan and Taiwan of China have established a mature objective preliminary combination’s litigation system. Analyzing the judicial application of our country’s objective preliminary combination’s litigation combined with relevant cases in our country’s judicial practice, we can see the universality and scope of the system’s application. At the same time, it can be seen that the system is in confusion in the judicial application of our country, indicating that our country urgently needs to establish an objective preliminary combination’s litigation. Through the discussion of the connotation, characteristics, value and significance of the objective preliminary combination’s litigation, and the rules of judgment, we hope to promote the establishment of an objective preliminary combination’s litigation system in our country and achieve a win-win situation of judicial justice and efficiency. 客观的预备合并之诉是诉的合并制度中十分重要的组成部分，德国、日本和我国台湾地区已确立起成熟的客观预备合并之诉制度，然而此项制度在我国大陆地区却是立法上的空白。结合我国司法实务中的相关案例，对我国客观的预备合并之诉的司法适用现状进行分析，可以看出该制度适用的普遍性、范围的广泛性。 同时也可以看出该制度在我国司法适用中的混乱，表明我国亟需建立客观的预备合并之诉。通过对客观的预备合并之诉的内涵及特征、价值及意义和裁判规则的探讨，希望推动我国客观的预备合并之诉制度的建立，实现司法公正与效率的双赢。
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.35534/pss.0302013
• Cite: 贺婷婷．论客观的预备合并之诉［J］．社会科学进展，2021（2）：214-226．