国际中文开源期刊平台

试论行政诉讼当中责令履行期限的本质和效力 ——以启东市发圣船舶工程有限公司诉启东市人民政府渡口行政许可案评析

On the Essence and Effect of the Time Limit of Order for Performance in Administrative Litigation —Analysis of the Ferry Administrative License Case of Qidong Fasheng Shipbuilding Engineering Co., Ltd. v. Qidong People’s Government

社会科学进展 / 2023,5(4)：302-317 / 2023-09-06 132 146

查看全文 下载文档

• 作者： 杨铮祺     
• 单位：

  上海政法学院，上海

• 关键词： 履行期限；程序正当性；司法裁量；冲突规则
• Fulfillment deadline; Procedural legitimacy; Judicial discretion; Conflict rules
• 摘要： 人民法院在行政诉讼当中责令行政机关履行法定职责是针对行政相对人因行政不作为而采取的救济方式，也是实质性解决行政争议的重要措施。责令履行法定职责是司法权与行政权交汇的结果，司法权通过履行期限具有的程序性价值和效力直接监督、调整着行政权的行使。法律对于人民法院如何确定履行期限并没有明确规定，导致在判断行政机关在履行期限内作出行政行为的合法性时标准模糊。人民法院应当充分运用好司法裁量权，依据法律规范的规定并结合具体案情确定及时、可行的履行期限。
• In administrative litigation, the people’s court orders administrativeorgans to fulfill their statutory responsibilities, which is a remedy foradministrative inaction caused by the administrative counterpart, and is alsoan important measure for substantive resolution of administrative disputes.Ordering the performance of statutory duties is the result of the intersection ofjudicial power and administrative power. Judicial power directly supervises andadjusts the exercise of administrative power through the procedural value andeffectiveness of the performance period. The law does not have clear provisionson how the people’s court determines the performance period, resulting inunclear standards when judging the legality of administrative actions taken byadministrative organs within the performance period. The people’s court shouldfully utilize its judicial discretion, determine a timely and feasible time limit forperformance in accordance with legal norms and specific case situations.
• DOI： https://doi.org/10.35534/pss.0504029
• 引用： 杨铮祺．试论行政诉讼当中责令履行期限的本质和效力——以启东市发圣船舶工程有限公司诉启东市人民政府渡口行政许可案评析［J］．社会科学进展，2023，5（4）：302-317．