International Open Access Journal Platform

logo
open
cover
Current Views: 1423949
Current Downloads: 475626

Progress in Social Sciences

ISSN Print: 2664-6943
ISSN Online: 2664-6951
Contact Editorial Office
Join Us
DATABASE
SUBSCRIBE
Journal index
Journal
Your email address

论权利行使与财产犯罪的边界

The Boundary between the Exercise of Rights and Property Crimes

Progress in Social Sciences / 2025,7(10): 801-806 / 2025-11-04 look28 look19
  • Authors: 曹婕
  • Information:
    中南财经政法大学,武汉
  • Keywords:
    Exercise of rights; Property crimes; Paths of excluding crimes; Exclusion of illegality
    权利行使; 财产犯罪; 出罪路径; 违法阻却
  • Abstract: In modern society ruled by law, awareness of rights has become an instinct of human beings. However, the exercise of rights is not without restrictions and must abide by its legal boundaries. In judicial practice, cases involving abuse of rights by means of property crimes are mostly handled with the disposition of excluding crimes. In recent years, however, there has been a certain trend of criminalization, and there is a lack of a scientific and unified solution. To achieve effective exclusion of crimes, it is necessary to accurately define the scope and types of the exercise of rights. For the exercise of rights for the realization of ownership, according to the protected legal interests of property crimes, the possibility of constituting property crimes can basically be ruled out. For the exercise of rights for the realization of claims, while acknowledging the existence of property losses, crimes can be excluded at the level of illegality through the review of the basis of rights, and the necessity and proportionality of means. Acts of exercising claims constitute property crimes only when they cause property losses to the victim, adopt means that conform to the constitutive elements of crimes, have no justifications for excluding illegality, and have the intent of illegal possession. 在现代法治社会,权利意识成为人的本能。然而,权利的行使并非毫无限制,应恪守其合法边界。司法实践针对以财产犯罪手段实施权利滥用的案件,多采取出罪的处理态度,近年来却又呈现出一定的入罪化趋势,缺乏一套科学统一的解决方案。为实现有效出罪,需精准界定权利行使的范围与类型:针对所有权实现型权利行使,根据财产犯罪的保护法益,基本可以排除构成财产犯罪的可能;针对债权实现型权利行使,在承认存在财产损失的同时,可以通过对权利基础、手段必要性与相当性的审查,在违法性层面出罪。债权行使行为,只有在造成被害人财产损失,实施符合构成要件的手段行为,不具备违法性阻却事由,且具有非法占有目的时,才成立财产犯罪。
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.35534/pss.0710136 (registering DOI)
  • Cite: 曹婕.论权利行使与财产犯罪的边界[J].社会科学进展,2025,7(10):801-806.
Already have an account?
+86 027-59302486
Top