International Open Access Journal Platform

论生态环境损害赔偿诉讼与民事公益诉讼的合并审理

On the Consolidated Trial of Ecological Environmental Damage Compensation Litigation and Civil Public Interest Litigation

Progress in Social Sciences / 2025,7(12): 976-982 / 2025-12-26 10 4

View Download PDF

• Authors: 隋璐明
• Information:

  山东师范大学，济南

• Keywords:
  Connection between two lawsuits; Subjective competition of claims; Consolidated trial
  两诉衔接; 请求权的主观竞合; 合并审理
• Abstract: The connection between the two types of lawsuits is not only a legislative issue but also requires urgent interpretation and analysis. The principle of prioritizing ecological and environmental damage compensation lawsuits stems from the gradual development of environmental rule-of-law concepts and policy guidance, including the priority for filing and hearing cases. The rationale for this prioritization has issues such as a single perspective and conflicts in the ordering rules. Through the examination of both substantive and procedural aspects, the connection between the two lawsuits represents a subjective competition of claims in the field of public interest, characterized by different normative combinations under the same purpose of performance in legal facts. The obstructive effect under filing priority arises from avoiding duplicate litigation, but consolidation of hearings is more appropriate. The plaintiff 's preparation for or choice of consolidated lawsuits can serve as the litigation rule for connecting the two types of lawsuits. 两诉衔接不仅是立法问题也亟需解释分析。生态环境损害赔偿诉讼优先论源于环保法治理念的渐进发展和政策导向，包括起诉和审理优先。优先论的理据存在视角单一、排序规则冲突等问题。通过实体和程序的检视，两诉衔接是公益领域的请求权的主观竞合，具有法律事实符合同一给付目的下不同规范组合的特征。起诉优先下的妨诉效果源于避免重复诉讼，但合并审理更恰当。原告当事人预备或选择合并之诉可以作为两诉衔接的诉讼规则。
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.35534/pss.0712165 (registering DOI)
• Cite: 隋璐明．论生态环境损害赔偿诉讼与民事公益诉讼的合并审理［J］．社会科学进展，2025，7（12）：976-982.