-
Authors:
刘韵祺
-
Information:
上海政法学院,上海
-
Keywords:
Educational administrative litigation; Legal reservation; Proportionality principle; Due process; Academic autonomy
教育行政诉讼; 法律保留; 比例原则; 正当程序; 学术自治
-
Abstract:
The conflict between university management authority and students’ right to education has become increasingly prominent, making educational administrative litigation an important arena for rights relief. Grounded in the transitional era from a legal vacuum to rule-of-law review, this paper is committed to constructing a refined normative system for legality review. At the level of legal reservation, the paper advocates breaking the traditional myth of blanket authorization by distinguishing administrative disciplinary actions from academic evaluations based on the nature of the conduct—the former subject to strict reservation while the latter being relaxed. At the level of the proportionality principle, through tiered tests of appropriateness, necessity, and proportionality in the narrow sense, the paper seeks to substantively correct the discretionary power of universities. Notably, the review paradigm also requires deep transformation—seeking a dialectical balance between the expansion of due process principles and deference to academic autonomy, promoting the review standard from formal legality to substantive legality, and ultimately achieving good law and good governance in the field of education.
高校管理权与学生受教育权之间的冲突日趋显性化,教育行政诉讼随之成为权利救济的重要场域。本文立足于从法外之地向司法审查转型的时代背景,致力于构建一套精细化的合法性审查规范体系。在法律保留层面,文章主张打破概括授权的传统迷思,依据行为性质区分行政性惩戒与学术性评价,前者适用严格保留,后者则予以弱化,而在比例原则层面,通过适当性、必要性与均衡性的阶层化测试,对高校裁量权进行实质性矫正。不可忽视的是,司法审查范式亦需深层转型——在正当程序原则的扩张与学术自治的尊让之间寻求辩证平衡,推动司法审查标准从形式合法迈向实质合法,最终实现教育领域的良法善治。
-
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35534/pss.0801010 (registering DOI)
-
Cite:
刘韵祺.教育行政诉讼合法性审查的原则展开[J].社会科学进展,2026,8(1):50-54.