Behavioral decision-making; Hasty decision-making context; Perfectionism; State perfectionism; Time pressure
行为决策; 仓促情境; 完美主义; 状态完美主义; 时间压力
Abstract:
Object : To investigate whether significant differences exist between perfectionists and non-perfectionists in decision-making time, decision-making accuracy, and behavioral patterns under hasty decision-making conditions characterized by information asymmetry and time constraints. Methods : Using the Zi’s Negative Perfectionism Questionnaire, 19 university students with perfectionist tendencies and 18 without such tendencies were selected from a pool of 183 undergraduates to participate in a simulated decision-making experiment. Results : Under conditions of limited time and insufficient information, both groups exhibited a “state perfectionism” tendency—avoiding imperfect options—and showed no significant differences in average decision time or accuracy. However, under conditions of sufficient time but information kept insufficient, the perfectionist group maintained a strong “state perfectionism” tendency. In contrast, the non-perfectionist group significantly reduced their avoidance of imperfect options. Conclusion : Non-perfectionists exhibit “state perfectionism” under time pressure, and perfectionists show crosssituational perfectionism.
目的:本研究探索在信息不对称、时间不充分的仓促决策情境下,完美主义者与非完美主义者在决策时间、决策准确度,以及决策行为等方面是否存在显著差异。方法:通过使用消极完美主义问卷,从183名本科生中选取完美主义倾向的学生19人和非完美主义倾向的学生18人参与模拟决策实验。结果:在决策时间有限、决策信息也不充分的情境下,完美主义者和非完美主义者都表现出回避残缺选项的“状态完美主义”倾向,且两组在平均决策时间和决策准确度上没有显著差异;在时间充分但决策信息有限的情境下,前者继续表现出“状态完美主义”倾向,且前者所用的决策时间是后者两倍,但前者的决策准确度只是略高于后者(临界显著),后者在时间充分时,回避残缺的倾向显著缓解。结论:非完美主义者在时间压力下做决策,会表现出“状态完美主义”,而完美主义者的完美主义是跨情境的。