-
Information:
上海政法学院,上海
-
Keywords:
Emergency arbitrator; Interim measures; Enforcement mechanism; Commercial arbitration
紧急仲裁员; 临时措施; 执行机制; 商事仲裁
-
Abstract:
As the core system for filling the pre-hearing emergency relief gap in commercial arbitration, the enforcement mechanism of emergency arbitrator interim measures is directly related to arbitration credibility and the protection of parties’ rights and interests. Currently, although China has initially established a institutional framework by relying on rule iterations and the newly revised Arbitration Law of the People’s Republic of China, it still faces practical dilemmas such as the absence of high-tier legislation, the alienation of judicial review, and prominent regional enforcement imbalances.
紧急仲裁员临时措施是填补商事仲裁庭前应急救济空白的核心制度,其执行效能直接关乎仲裁公信力与权益保障。当前,我国虽依托规则迭代与新修订的《中华人民共和国仲裁法》初步搭建了制度框架,但仍面临高位阶立法缺位、司法审查尺度偏离预设边界及地域执行失衡等现实困境。本文系统剖析我国该执行机制的运行现状与深层症结,在借鉴《联合国国际贸易法委员会国际商事仲裁示范法》及域外成熟经验的基础上,从健全顶层立法、统一司法标准、深化程序衔接与加强国际协同四个维度,提出构建高效融通的执行路径,以期为全面提升我国商事仲裁的法治化水平与国际竞争力提供坚实支撑。
-
DOI:
10.35534/pss.0808118 (registering DOI)
-
Cite:
晏宇宁.我国紧急仲裁员临时措施执行机制研究[J].社会科学进展,2026,8(8):695-699.