Abstract:
Objective: To evaluate the teaching effect of PBL and CBL in ECG teaching. Methods: The
clinical medical students were divided into two groups. One group adopted the traditional teaching
method, the other group adopted the new teaching method, that is, the combination of PBL and CBL. The
teaching effect was compared in three aspects: the score of ECG theory examination, the score of ECG
interpretation and the students’ evaluation about teaching effect. Results: compared with the traditional
teaching method, the combination of PBL and CBL teaching method had better teaching effect. The score
of ECG analysis in the new teaching method group was significantly higher than that in the traditional
teaching group (p<0.05). In the six items of arousing students’ interest, improving clinical thinking ability,
ECG reading ability, cultivating team spirit, cultivating self-learning ability and teachers’ teaching method
satisfaction, the scores of students in the new teaching method group were significantly higher than those
in the traditional teaching group (all p<0.05).
Conclusion: The combination of PBL and CBL teaching method is based on clinical cases. The students’
discussion and analyse of groups can fully mobilize the students’ initiative in learning, and has a good
teaching effect in the electrocardiographic teaching.
目的:评价 PBL 与 CBL 相结合的教学方法在心电图见习教学中的教学效果。方法:将临床医学生分为 2 组,一组采取传统教学方法,另一组采取新的教学方法,即 PBL 与 CBL 相结合的教学方法,通过心电图理论考试成绩、心电图判读成绩、学生对教学效果的评价三方面进行比较教学效果。结果:相对于传统的教学方法,PBL 与 CBL 相结合的教学方法有更好的教学效果,新教学方法组学生心电图分析成绩明显高于传统教学组学生成绩(p<0.05),在激发学生兴趣、提高临床思维能力、心电图判读能力、培养团队合作精神、培养自主学习能力及教师教学方法满意度这 6 个项目中,新教学方法组学生评分明显高于传统教学组学生(均p<0.05)。结论:PBL 与 CBL 相结合的教学方法以临床病例作为基础,学生进行分组讨论分析,可充分调动学生学习的积极主动性,在枯燥的心电诊断学教学中有良好的教学效果。