International Open Access Journal Platform

中文版菲舍尔气质量表在大学生群体中的信效度检验

Revision and Reliability and Validity of Chinese Version of Fisher Temperament Inventory in College Students

霍依宁, 孙静清, 许宝怡, 陈莅蓉

Psychology of China / 2026,8(8): 1187-1193 / 2026-08-20 16 11

View Download PDF

• Information:

  苏州科技大学，苏州

• Keywords:
  Fisher temperament inventory; Reliability; Validity; Personality biology
  菲舍尔气质量表; 信度; 效度; 人格生物学
• Abstract: Objective To systematically revise the Chinese version of Fisher Temperament Inventory (FTI) and test its reliability and validity among Chinese college students, so as to provide a localized tool for measuring the biological basis of temperament in accordance with psychometric standards. Methods With the authorization of the original scale author, the Chinese version was completed through the process of “translation-back translation-cultural adaptationexpert review”. A total of 587 college students from universities across China were selected by convenient sampling method, and the NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) was administered at the same time as the criterion. SPSS 27.0 was used for item analysis, reliability analysis, correlation analysis and demographic difference test, and AMOS 24.0 was used for confirmatory factor analysis to test the structural validity. Results (1) Item analysis showed that the correlation coefficients of 56 items with their respective dimension scores ranged from 0.301 to 0.632, and with the total score ranged from 0.172 to 0.538, all reaching significant levels (p<0.01). (2) Reliability analysis showed that the Cronbach’s α coefficients of the four dimensions (Explorer, Builder, Director, Negotiator) were 0.787, 0.812, 0.812 and 0.829 respectively, and the total scale α coefficient was 0.919. (3) Validity analysis showed that KMO value was 0.893, Bartlett sphericity test χ2=9559.244 (p<0.001). The fitting indexes of confirmatory factor analysis were χ2/ df=2.556, RMSEA=0.052, RMR=0.04, CFI=0.725, TLI=0.713, indicating acceptable structural validity. Using NEOFFI as the criterion, each dimension showed a theoretically consistent correlation pattern, indicating good criterionrelated validity. (4) Demographic analysis showed that there were significant differences in scale scores among gender, education level and family location. Conclusion The Chinese version of Fisher Temperament Inventory has good item discrimination, internal consistency reliability, structural validity and criterion-related validity. It can be used to evaluate the temperament characteristics of Chinese college students, and provides a supplementary measurement tool for personality and temperament research, clinical psychological assessment, career adaptation and interpersonal relationship evaluation. 目的：对菲舍尔气质量表（FisherTemperamentInventory，FTI）进行中文版系统修订，并在中国大学生群体中检验其信度与效度，为气质的生物学基础测量提供符合心理测量学标准的本土化工具。方法：在获得原版量表授权基础上，采用“翻译—回译—文化调适—专家评审”流程完成中文版修订；以方便抽样法选取全国多所高校587名在校大学生完成测评，同时施测大五人格简版量表（NEO-FFI）作为效标；采用SPSS27.0进行项目分析、信度分析、相关分析及人口学差异检验，采用AMOS24.0进行验证性因素分析检验结构效度。结果：（1）项目分析显示，56个条目与所属维度得分相关系数为0.301~0.632，与总分相关为0.172~0.538，均达到显著水平（p<0.01）；（2）信度分析显示，探索者、建设者、指导者、协调者四个维度的克隆巴赫α系数分别为0.787、0.812、0.812、0.829，总量表α系数为0.919；（3）效度分析显示，KMO值为0.893，Bartlett球形检验χ2=9559.244（p<0.001），验证性因素分析拟合指标为χ2/df=2.556、RMSEA=0.052、RMR=0.04、CFI=0.725、TLI=0.713，结构效度可接受；以NEO-FFI为效标，各维度呈现理论相符的关联模式，效标关联效度良好；（4）人口学分析显示，量表得分在性别、教育水平、家庭所在地方面存在不同程度的显著差异。结论：中文版菲舍尔气质量表具有良好的项目区分度、内部一致性信度、结构效度与效标关联效度，可用于我国在校大学生的气质特征测评，为人格与气质研究、临床心理评估、职业适配与人际关系评估提供补充性测量工具。
• DOI: 10.35534/pc.0808174 (registering DOI)
• Cite: 霍依宁, 孙静清, 许宝怡, 陈莅蓉. (2026). 中文版菲舍尔气质量表在大学生群体中的信效度检验. 中国心理学前沿, 8 (8), 1187-1193.