-
Authors:
肖卫锋
-
Information:
上海政法学院,上海
-
Keywords:
Civil enforcement; The procedure for changing or adding the enforcement parties; Execution document
民事执行; 执行当事人变更、追加程序; 执行文
-
Abstract:
In civil litigation, the enforcement procedure is an important link to ensure judicial justice. However, for many reasons, the parties involved in the enforcement may change, which directly affects the progress of the enforcement procedure. This article first points out that the current “Amendment and Addition Regulations” have problems such as insufficient supply of procedural norms, unclear review subjects, undefined application time, and incomplete relief channels. By comparing the enforcement document systems of Germany, Japan and the relevant systems in Taiwan region, this paper puts forward improvement suggestions such as expanding the applicable scenarios, clarifying the procedure initiation methods, improving the review procedures and strengthening the protection of procedural rights and interests, with the aim of constructing a more scientific, reasonable and efficient procedure for the change and addition of enforcement parties.
在民事诉讼中,执行程序是确保司法公正的重要环节。然而,由于许多原因,执行当事人可能会发生变化,直接影响执行程序的进行。本文首先指出《变更、追加规定》存在程序规范供给不足、审查主体不明确、申请时间未明确、救济途径不完善等问题。通过比较德国、日本执行文制度及中国台湾地区有关制度,本文提出了扩充适用情形、明确程序启动方式、完善审查程序及强化程序权益保障等完善建议,以期构建更为科学、合理、高效的执行当事人变更、追加程序。
-
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35534/pss.0707104
-
Cite:
肖卫锋.试论执行当事人变更、追加之程序完善[J].社会科学进展,2025,7(7):618-623.