International Open Access Journal Platform

回应性司法与舆论的交互：以两则典型案例为切入

Responsive Justice and Public Opinion: An Interaction Analysis Through Two Typical Cases

李沐雨

Progress in Social Sciences / 2026,8(3): 117-122 / 2026-04-07 11 6

View Download PDF

• Information:

  上海政法学院，上海

• Keywords:
  Judicial moralization; Judicial politicization; Responsive justice; Proactive jurisprudence; Public opinion oversight
  司法道德化; 回应型司法; 能动司法; 舆论监督
• Abstract: Under the influence of new media technologies, online public opinion often exerts pressure on the judicial system through collective appeals. Responsive justice, as a form of proactive jurisprudence, must adeptly navigate the dual relationships between law and morality, and law and politics when addressing societal concerns. It should fulfill its core functions of resolving disputes and mitigating conflicts. Cases such as the Jiang Ge Case and the Kunshan Self- Defense Case exemplify how responsive justice grapples with the interplay of legal, moral, and political dimensions in practice. When addressing legal-moral dilemmas, responsive justice should prioritize intrinsic legal values while cautiously allowing extrinsic justice values as exceptions. It must guard against moral overreach in judicial narratives and avoid allowing legal principles to overstep established rules in adjudication. In tackling legal-political challenges, responsive justice should maintain judicial independence, resisting undue administrative interference in the exercise of judicial authority and preventing societal stability concerns from superseding case-specific justice in verdicts. 新媒体技术加持下的网络民意通常以群体性诉求的形式对司法施加影响。以回应型司法为代表的能动司法在回应社会舆论时，应处理好法律与道德、法律与政治的两大关系，承担好定纷止争、化解矛盾的两大功能。“江歌案”“昆山反杀案”是实践中涉及法律与道德，法律与政治的回应型司法案例。回应型司法在回应法律与道德问题时，应当以追求案内法律价值为原则，追求案外正义价值为例外，警惕裁判叙事上的道德化与对法律话语的僭越、裁判方法上法律原则对法律规则的突破。回应型司法在回应法律与政治的难题时，应当保持司法的相对独立，警惕裁判过程中行政力量对审判权独立行使的不当干预、裁判结果上社会维稳价值对个案正义价值的压倒。
• DOI: 10.35534/pss.0803022 (registering DOI)
• Cite: 李沐雨．回应性司法与舆论的交互：以两则典型案例为切入［J］．社会科学进展，2026，8（3）：117-122.