International Open Access Journal Platform

学位纠纷行政诉讼中正当程序原则的司法适用

Judicial Application of the Principle of Due Process in Administrative Litigation Involving Degree Disputes

董清馨

Progress in Social Sciences / 2026,8(5): 436-442 / 2026-05-28 10 4

View Download PDF

• Information:

  上海政法学院法律学院，上海

• Keywords:
  Principle of due process; Educational administrative litigation; Powers of higher education institutions; Degree revocation; Procedural justice
  正当程序原则; 教育行政诉讼; 高校职权; 学位撤销; 程序正义
• Abstract: The relationship between students and schools in the field of higher education is becoming increasingly complex, and the role of the principle of due process, one of the basic principles of administrative law, in education administrative litigation is becoming more prominent. As a core basic principle of administrative law, the core requirement of the principle of due process is that when an administrative body makes decisions adverse to a party, it must fulfill procedural obligations such as prior notice and the opportunity to make statements and defenses. Starting from the “Tian Yong Case,” this principle has gradually become a key basis for judgments in education administrative litigation. The implementation of the “Law of the People’s Republic of China on Academic Degrees” (hereinafter referred to as the “Degree Law”) marks that the procedural requirements in the field of degree conferral and revocation have gradually moved from judicial principles toward statutory confirmation. However, the relevant provisions are still relatively general and have difficulty fully addressing the complex disputes in education administrative litigation. This article takes the “Chai Lijie Case” as the core sample, combined with the “Tian Yong Case” and the “Yu Yanru Case” and under the background of the implementation of the Degree Law, systematically analyzes the application logic, legal rationale, and practical dilemmas of the principle of due process in education administrative litigation. It also proposes optimization paths such as refining evidence standards, clarifying review boundaries, and strengthening case guidance, aiming to provide theoretical support for procedural justice and the protection of students’ rights in education administrative litigation. 高等教育领域学生与学校之间的关系日趋复杂化，行政法的基本原则之一正当程序原则在教育行政诉讼中的作用日益明显，正当程序原则作为行政法的核心基本原则，其核心要求为行政主体作出不利于相对人的决定时，需履行事先告知、听取陈述申辩等程序义务。［1］从“田永案”起该原则逐步成为教育行政诉讼裁判的关键依据，《中华人民共和国学位法》（以下简称《学位法》）的施行，标志着学位授予与撤销领域的程序要求由司法原则逐步走向制定法确认，但相关规定仍较为原则，难以完全回应教育行政诉讼中的复杂争议。本文以“柴丽杰案”为核心样本，同时结合“田永案”和“于艳茹案”，在《学位法》施行背景下，系统分析正当程序原则在教育行政诉讼中的适用逻辑、法理基础与现实困境，并提出细化举证标准、明确审查边界、强化案例指引等优化路径，以期为教育行政诉讼中程序正义与学生权利保障提供理论支持。
• DOI: 10.35534/pss.0805076 (registering DOI)
• Cite: 董清馨．学位纠纷行政诉讼中正当程序原则的司法适用［J］．社会科学进展，2026，8（5）：436-442.