Keywords:
Perceived invalidation of emotion scale (PIES); Chinese adolescents;Reliability; Validity; Measurement invariance
感知情绪失效量表(PIES);中国青少年;信效度;测量等值
Abstract:
Objective: Testing the reliability, validity and measurement invariance of
the Chinese version of Perceived Invalidation of Emotion Scale (PIES) in Chinese
adolescents. Methods: 964 middle school students were investigated, 133 students
were followed to complete the Chinese version of PIES after 4 weeks for test-retest
reliability. WHO well-being index, positive emotions, relationships needs frustration,
loneliness and depression were used as the criteria related validity instrument. Results:
The internal consistency reliability of PIES was 0.91, and the test-retest reliabilities
were 0.74. Perceived invalidation of emotion was negatively correlated with WHO
well-being index, positive emotions and positively correlated with relationships needs
frustration, loneliness and depression. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the
one-factor model of PIES had good fit with the data. The configural, metric, scalar
and strict invariance of the Chinese version of PIES across gender were all acceptable.
Conclusion: The Chinese version of PIES has good reliability and validity, as well as
gender equivalence.
目的:修订感知情绪失效量表(The Perceived Invalidation of Emotion
Scale,PIES)中文版,并在国内青少年群体中检验其信度、效度和跨性别的测
量等值性。方法:选取994名青少年进行测量,回收有效问卷964份,并在4周后,
随机选取133名被试进行重测,用以检验PIES中文版的结构效度、校标关联效度、
内部一致信度与重测信度,并检验 PIES 中文版的跨性别的测量等值。结果:验
证性因素分析显示,PIES 中文版的单因素模型各项拟合指数均拟合良好;PIES
中文版与幸福感、积极情感显著负相关,与关系需要受挫、孤独、抑郁呈显著
正相关。PIES 中文版内部一致性信度良好,重测信度为 0.74。多组验证性因素
分析结果显示,跨性别的形态等值、因子负荷等值与截距等值均被接受。结论:
PIES 中文版具有良好的信效度以及跨性别的测量等值性,可以作为测量我国青
少年群体感知情绪失效的可靠工具。