国际中文开源期刊平台

logo
open
cover
当前浏览量 618115
当前下载量 883610

中国心理学前沿

Psychology of China

ISSN Print: 2664-1798
ISSN Online: 2664-1801
联系编辑部
加入我们
友情链接
邮箱订阅
选择期刊索引
选择期刊
您的邮箱地址

感知情绪失效量表在中国青少年中的信效度检验

Testing Reliability and Validity of the Perceived Invalidation of Emotion Scale in Chinese Adolescents

中国心理学前沿 / 2020,2(6):489-503  / 2020-06-08 look1635 look2793
  • 作者: 赵海燕¹      郑春婵¹      周建华²*     
  • 单位:
    1. 北海卫生学校临床医学教研室,北海;
    2. 华南师范大学心理院,广州
  • 关键词: 感知情绪失效量表(PIES);中国青少年;信效度;测量等值
  • Perceived invalidation of emotion scale (PIES); Chinese adolescents;Reliability; Validity; Measurement invariance
  • 摘要: 目的:修订感知情绪失效量表(The Perceived Invalidation of Emotion Scale,PIES)中文版,并在国内青少年群体中检验其信度、效度和跨性别的测 量等值性。方法:选取994名青少年进行测量,回收有效问卷964份,并在4周后, 随机选取133名被试进行重测,用以检验PIES中文版的结构效度、校标关联效度、 内部一致信度与重测信度,并检验 PIES 中文版的跨性别的测量等值。结果:验 证性因素分析显示,PIES 中文版的单因素模型各项拟合指数均拟合良好;PIES 中文版与幸福感、积极情感显著负相关,与关系需要受挫、孤独、抑郁呈显著 正相关。PIES 中文版内部一致性信度良好,重测信度为 0.74。多组验证性因素 分析结果显示,跨性别的形态等值、因子负荷等值与截距等值均被接受。结论: PIES 中文版具有良好的信效度以及跨性别的测量等值性,可以作为测量我国青 少年群体感知情绪失效的可靠工具。
  • Objective: Testing the reliability, validity and measurement invariance of the Chinese version of Perceived Invalidation of Emotion Scale (PIES) in Chinese adolescents. Methods: 964 middle school students were investigated, 133 students were followed to complete the Chinese version of PIES after 4 weeks for test-retest reliability. WHO well-being index, positive emotions, relationships needs frustration, loneliness and depression were used as the criteria related validity instrument. Results: The internal consistency reliability of PIES was 0.91, and the test-retest reliabilities were 0.74. Perceived invalidation of emotion was negatively correlated with WHO well-being index, positive emotions and positively correlated with relationships needs frustration, loneliness and depression. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the one-factor model of PIES had good fit with the data. The configural, metric, scalar and strict invariance of the Chinese version of PIES across gender were all acceptable. Conclusion: The Chinese version of PIES has good reliability and validity, as well as gender equivalence.
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.35534/pc.0206034
  • 引用: 赵海燕,郑春婵,周建华.感知情绪失效量表在中国青少年中的信效度检验[J].中国心理学前沿,2020,2(6):489-503.
    https://doi.org/10.35534/pc.0206034
已有账号
027-59302486