Abstract:
Objective: Combing the research status quo of life satisfaction in China, and exploring its evolution path and development context.Methods: A total of 635 valid bibliographies of 424 core journals and 211 master or doctor papers included in 2000- 2017 in CNKI database were analyzed by CiteSpace software. Results: The analysis of institution form a visual map containing 34 nodes, 9 connections, and the density is 0.016;the analysis of author form a visual map containing 79 nodes, 63 connections, and the density is 0.0204; the analysis of key words form a visual map containing 132 nodes, 221 connections, and the density is 0.0256. Conclusion: ① The analysis of institution shows that the cooperation between the institutions is not obvious, our country has not yet formed the core institutions, and life satisfaction research involving much disciplines, including psychology and pedagogy, but interdisciplinary cooperation is rare; ② The analysis of author shows that the authors has not formed a wide range of close cooperation , the adolescent student groups and the elderly group is the main study subject, the hotspot has changed with the development of social economy and culture; ③ The analysis of key words shows that researchers are keen to analyze the influencing factors of life satisfaction, among which social support, self- esteem and coping style are the most important influencing factors.
本研究目的:梳理我国生活满意度的研究现状,探究其演进路径与发展脉络。方法:借助CiteSpace软件对CNKI数据库中2000—2017年收录的424条核心期刊论文和211篇硕博士论文共计635篇有效文献题录进行可视化分析。结果:发文单位分析得到节点数N=34,连线E=9,中心度D=0.016的可视图谱;发文作者分析得到节点数N=79,连线E=63,中心度D=0.0204的可视图谱;关键词分析得到节点数N=132,连线E=221,中心度D=0.0256的可视图谱。结论:①发文单位分析表明单位间合作情况不明显,国内生活满意度研究尚未形成核心机构群,其次,生活满意度研究涉及学科较多,其中以心理学和教育学为主,但跨学科合作极少;②发文作者分析表明作者之间尚未形成广泛紧密的合作关系,青少年学生群体和老年人群体是作者们一直较为关注的研究对象,研究热点问题随着社会经济文化的发展有所变化;③关键词分析表明研究者热衷于对生活满意度进行影响因素分析,其中社会支持、自尊和应对方式是较为重要的影响因素。