International Open Access Journal Platform

地方本科院校新生学习参与的潜在类别分析

Latent Class Analysis of Freshmen’s Learning Engagement in Local Higher Education Institution

Psychology of China / 2019,1(8): 599-610 / 2019-10-14 5991 8795

View Download PDF

• Authors: 唐辉¹* 霍中开¹ 李鑫¹ 李思贤²
• Information:

  1. 肇庆学院，肇庆；
  2. 肇庆市工业贸易学校，肇庆

• Keywords:
  Learning Engagement,Latent Class Analysis,Freshmen,Local Higher Education Institution
  学习参与; 潜在类别分析; 新生; 地方本科院校
• Abstract: Previous studies on the characteristics of students' learning engagement in higher education focused on undergraduates in research universities, but the characteristics of freshmen's learning engagement in local higher education institutions were not studied suficiently. Using convenience sampling, the present study selected　515　freshmen from a local higher education institution in Guangdong province to complete Student Learning Engagement Scale and Academic Motivation Scale-College Version. The results indicated that three latent classes were identified, including high engagement-deep learning group(11.85%), moderate engagement-peers interactive group (35.92%) and low engagement-habit oriented group (52.23%). There were significant differences in the scores of intrinsic motivation (p<0.001,p'=0.04) and extrinsic motivation(p<0.05,p2=0.01). The scores of intrinsic motivation was lower in the low engagement-habit oriented group than in the other two groups, and the scores of extrinsic motivation was lower in the low engagement-habit oriented groupthan in the moderate engagement-peers interactive group. These findings suggest that freshmens learning engagement in local higher education institution is heterogeneity, which have implications for freshmen's academic counselling, supervision and management. 国内探讨大学生学习参与类型的研究主要集中于研究型大学本科生，对地方本科院校正处于适应阶段的新生学习参与类型关注较少。选取广东省某地方本科院校515名新生，采用大学生学习参与量表和大学生学习自我决定动机量表进行测量。结果发现，地方本科院校新生可分为高参与一深层学习（11.85%）、中等参与一同伴互动（35.92%）和低参与一习惯导向（52.23%）3个潜在类别。不同学习参与类型新生的内部动机（p<0.001，72=0.04）、外部动机（p<0.05，72=0.01）得分差异均有统计学意义。多重比较结果显示，高参与一深层学习组和中等参与一同伴互动组的内部动机得分均高于低参与一习惯导向组，中等参与一同伴互动组的外部动机得分高于低参与一习惯导向组。这些结果揭示了地方本科院校新生学习参与的异质性，为学业指导、监控和管理提供实践指导。
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.35534/pc.0108038
• Cite: 唐辉，霍中开，李鑫，等．地方本科院校新生学习参与的潜在类别分析［J］．中国心理学前沿, 2019，1 （8）：
  599-610．
  https://doi.org/10.35534/pc.0108038