Keywords:
Multiple intelligences; The matic drawing psychometric test; 3~6-year old children
多元智能;主题绘画心理测验;3 ~ 6 岁幼儿
Abstract:
Objective: to develop a multiple intelligences thematic drawing test for children aged 3~6
years, and to test its reliability and validity. Methods: firstly, the painting themes in the three intelligent
fields were determined by interview method, then the targeted coding index system was constructed
by literature research and discussion with experts, and finally the reliability and validity were tested
by questionnaire survey and psychometric painting method. Results: in terms of internal consistency
reliability, the Cronbach’α coefficient of theme 1 “It’s Cold” drawing test is 0.91, Cronbach’α coefficient of
theme 2 “Let’s play together” is 0.86, Cronbach’α coefficient of theme 3 “Listen to music and draw freely”
is 0.86; in terms of rater reliability, theme 1 was 0.87, theme 2 was 0.91, and theme 3 was 0.84; in terms
of calibration validity, the total scores of the three thematic drawing tests were significantly positively
correlated with the questionnaire dimensions in each field; in addition, the test also had good content
validity and discriminant validity. Conclusion: The series of thematic drawing instruments and their
coding system meet the psychometric requirements and can be used as an effective assessment tool for the
multiple intelligence development of children aged 3~6 years.
目的:编制适用于3 ~ 6 岁幼儿的多元智能主题绘画测验,并检验其信效度。方法:首先采用访谈法确定三个智能领域的绘画主题,再通过文献调研和与专家商讨的方法来构建针对性的编码指标体系,最后采用问卷调查法和绘画心理测量法来检验其信效度。结果:在内部一致性信度上,主题一《天冷了》绘画测验的Cronbach’α 系数为0.91,主题二《大家一起玩》的Cronbach’α 系数为0.86,主题三《听音乐自由绘画》的 Cronbach’α 系数为0.86;在评分者信度上,主题一为0.87,主题二为0.91,主题三为0.84;在校标效度上,三个主题绘画测验总分与领域内各问卷维度均呈显著正相关;此外,该测验还具有良好的内容效度和区分效度。结论:该系列主题绘画测量工具及其编码体系符合心理测量学要求,可以作为3 ~ 6 岁幼儿智能发展的有效评估工具。