国际中文开源期刊平台

logo
open
cover
当前浏览量 616806
当前下载量 881456

中国心理学前沿

Psychology of China

ISSN Print: 2664-1798
ISSN Online: 2664-1801
联系编辑部
加入我们
友情链接
邮箱订阅
选择期刊索引
选择期刊
您的邮箱地址

接受策略调节经济博弈中的群体偏见和公平偏好

Acceptance Strategies Regulate Group Biases and Fairness Preferences in Economic Games

中国心理学前沿 / 2022,4(6):696-709 / 2022-07-06 look288 look441
  • 作者: 肖沿¹²      朱海东¹³      雷亮¹      孟欢蕾¹⁴      张俊¹     
  • 单位:
    1.石河子大学师范学院,石河子;
    2.新疆生产建设兵团第七师教育局,胡杨河;
    3.石河子大学心理应用研究中心,石河子;
    4.陕西省渭南市富平中学,渭南
  • 关键词: 内群体偏爱;公平偏好;接受策略;情绪调节;最后通牒博弈范式
  • In-group bias; Fairness preference; Acceptance strategy; Emotion regulation; Ultimatum game paradigm
  • 摘要: 群体偏见和公平偏好是生活中常见的社会现象。在群际互动中,研究者通常使用最后通牒博弈范式探讨个体的公平感知,并进一步发现群体偏见的产生直接对个体的公平偏好产生影响。群体偏见和公平偏好都会对个体的情绪体验产生作用,为了探讨无意识接受策略和有意识接受策略对公平偏好和群体偏见产生的情绪的调节作用,本研究采用句子重组任务和特殊指导语启动被试使用无意识接受策略和有意识接受策略,测查其对经济博弈中分配方案的拒绝率和主观情绪体验评分。结果发现,接受策略有效的调节了群体偏见下个体对公平感知的情绪状态及行为;无意识接受策略更强的促进不公平分配下的内群体偏爱,验证了公平偏好自动假说;有意识接受策略更强的促进公平分配下的外群体贬损,验证了公平偏好控制假说。
  • Group bias and fairness preferences are common social phenomena in life. During social interactions, researchers usually use the ultimatum game paradigm to explore individuals’ perceptions of fairness, and furtherly discover that the emergence of group biases directly affects individuals’ fairness preferences. Group bias and fairness preference both have an effect on the individual’s emotional experience. In order to explore the emotion regulation effect of unconscious acceptance strategies and conscious acceptance strategies on fairness preferences and group biases, this research aims to test subjects’ rejection rates and subjective emotional experience score, while unconscious acceptance strategies are motivated by connecting words to form sentences and conscious acceptance strategies are motivated by special instructions. The results show that the acceptance strategy effectively regulates the emotional state and behavior of individuals’ perception of fairness under the group bias; the unconscious acceptance strategy strongly promotes the in-group bias under unfair distribution, which verifies the fair preference automatic hypothesis; the conscious acceptance strategy strongly promotes the derogation of out-groups under fair distribution, which verifies the controlled-processing hypothesis.
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.35534/pc.0406085
  • 引用: 肖沿,朱海东,雷亮,等.接受策略调节经济博弈中的群体偏见和公平偏好[J].中国心理学前沿,2022,4(6):696-709.
已有账号
027-59302486