International Open Access Journal Platform

来拒去留：注意排斥与吸引的空间线索效应

Coming to Refuse and Going to Stay: Attending to the Spatial Cue Effects of Repulsion and Attraction

Psychology of China / 2024,6(7): 1288-1301 / 2024-08-14 223 275

View Download PDF

• Authors: 李宝玲
• Information:

  广西师范大学教育学部，桂林

• Keywords:
  Attentional repulsion effect; Attentional attraction effect; Perceptual processing; Attentional modulation
  注意排斥效应; 注意吸引效应; 知觉加工; 注意调制
• Abstract: The attentional repulsion effect (ARE)and the attentional attraction effect (AAE) are related to the spatial location and persistence of cue presentation. The present study examined the effect of cue condition on their effect sizes by comparing differences in subjects’ response rates to the location of the vernier. The results showed that in the ARE, subjects had higher response rates to vernier away from the cue, and in the AAE, higher response rates to vernier ipsilateral to the cue. At the same time, emergent cues also triggered a significant ARE; thus, cue spatial location played a significant role in the ARE, whereas the AAE was co-modulated by cue spatial location and persistence. Based on this conclusion, the present study analyzed the similarities and differences in possible attentional mechanisms between the two. 注意排斥效应（ARE）和注意吸引效应（AAE）与线索呈现的空间位置和持续性有关。通过比较被试对游标线位置的应答率差异，考察线索条件对其效应大小的影响。经前测和正式实验结果表明：ARE中，被试对远离线索的游标线应答率更高；AAE中，则对线索同侧游标线应答率更高。同时，突现性的线索也引发了显著的ARE。因此，线索空间位置对ARE起显著作用，而AAE则受到线索空间位置和持续性共同调制。基于该结论分析了两者可能存在的注意机制的异同性。
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.35534/pc.0607144
• Cite: 李宝玲．来拒去留：注意排斥与吸引的空间线索效应［J］．中国心理学前沿，2024，6（7）：1288-1301．