Abstract:
Objective: With schizophrenia prodromal stage performance “super high-risk groups” for effective identification, It is important to identify as early as possible. Avoiding to the development of disease states. Methods: By using SPIS Interview tool selection into the set of objects to 57 cases of schizophrenia patients with prodromal stage distribution to No intervention group(21cases) Psychological intervention group(16cases) drug Intervention group(20cases). Interventions for nine months, In march, June, September do comparative study of three groups, Evaluation using split personality questionnaire. Conclusion: Psychological intervention than without intervention effective drugs, and is significant to the effect of drug intervention in other intervention.
目的:对有精神分裂症前驱期表现的“超高危人群”进行识别,并且尽早进行有效的干预,从而避免其向疾病状态发展。方法:通过使用SPIS访谈工具选取入组对象57例精神分裂症前驱期患者分别分配到未干预组(21例)、心理干预组(16例)和药物干预组(20例),干预时间为9个月,分别在3月、6月、9月对三组作比较研究,治疗评定采用分裂型人格问卷。结果:3月药物干预组在阳性症状(p<0.05)、瓦解症状(p<0.05)差异显著;6月药物干预组阳性症状(p<0.05)差异显著;9月药物干预组在阳性症状(p<0.05)、阴性症状(p<0.05)与瓦解症状(p<0.05)差异显著。结论:调查显示药物干预、心理干预要比无干预有效,并且药物干预的总体效果要显著于其他干预。