-
Authors:
陈玉琨
郑茂平
-
Information:
西南大学音乐学院,重庆
-
Keywords:
Music performance anxiety; Big five personality; Personality; Spatiotemporal perspective
音乐表演焦虑; 大五人格; 人格特质; 时间观
-
Abstract:
Music performance anxiety is a significant psychological phenomenon affecting the mental state and performance quality of professional musicians, yet the mechanism underlying its individual differences remains insufficiently elucidated Based on the Big Five personality theory, this study introduced a four-dimensional analytical framework crossing “temporal sensitivity/spatial sensitivity” with “internal/external” and conducted a questionnaire survey of 308 professional music performers. Results indicated that neuroticism significantly promoted performance anxiety, while conscientiousness exhibited a stable inhibitory effect. Extraversion, openness, and agreeableness showed no direct predictive effects but may influence anxiety through indirect pathways. Sub-dimension analysis revealed that self-consciousness and impulsiveness in neuroticism, as well as self-discipline and orderliness in conscientiousness, are key factors affecting performance anxiety. The four-dimensional analytical framework based on the temporal-spatial perspective demonstrated strong explanatory power, providing a structured pathway for understanding how personality traits operate in different types of performance anxiety. The findings support understanding music performance anxiety as a multidimensional psychological construct and provide theoretical basis for personality-based understanding and intervention of performance anxiety.
音乐表演焦虑是影响专业音乐表演者心理状态与表演质量的重要心理现象,其个体差异机制尚未得到充分阐明。本研究基于大五人格理论,引入"时间敏感/空间敏感"与"内在/外在"交叉的四维分析视角,对308名专业音乐表演者进行问卷调查。结果表明,神经质对表演焦虑具有显著促进作用,尽责性表现出稳定的抑制效应,而外倾性、开放性与宜人性虽未表现出直接预测作用,但可能通过间接路径影响。子维度分析揭示,神经质中的自我意识与冲动性,以及尽责性中的自律与条理性,是影响表演焦虑的关键因素。基于时空观构建的四维分析框架表现出良好的解释效力,为理解人格特质在不同类型表演焦虑中的作用方式提供了结构化路径。研究结果支持将音乐表演焦虑理解为多维心理结构,并为基于人格特征的表演焦虑理解与干预提供理论依据。
-
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35534/pc.0803040 (registering DOI)
-
Cite:
陈玉琨, 郑茂平. (2026). 人格特质影响音乐表演焦虑的实证研究. 中国心理学前沿, 8 (3), 260-267.