International Open Access Journal Platform

共享内隐命运观的形成机制及后果的实验研究

Experimental study on the formation mechanism and consequences of Shared implicit fate beliefExperimental Study on the Formation Mechanism and Consequences of Shared Implicit Fate Belief

Psychology of China / 2020,2(7): 547-565  / 2020-07-01 1297 1968

View Download PDF

• Authors: 方作之¹      常保瑞²*     
• Information:

  1．武汉理工大学能源与动力工程学院，武汉；
  ２．广西师范大学教育学部心理学系，桂林

• Keywords: Negotiable fate; Conquerable fate; Fatalism; Shared implicit theory 可协商命运观；人定胜天命运观；宿命论命运观；共享内隐论
• Abstract: Objective: This study aims to understand the degree of environmental extremes encountered by people and the amount of social resources possessed by individuals, how the two interlace to affect people’s sense of control over the overall situation and how the sense of control leads to different shared implicit beliefs, and how shared implicit beliefs lead to different coping styles and behaviors. Methods: Situational stories were used to control the severity of the incident and the amount of resources. Results: The results showed that in addition to the major effects of severity and resource availability, the expected results were also found in the comparative analysis of the likelihood of injury improvement. In the scenario where M resources are rich, the subjects think that the possibility of the injured person’s injury getting better is significantly higher than that of the person with poor network, while in the case of a cold (not extreme), there is no significant effect of good network. Conclusion: Negotiable fate is the dominant fate in Chinese culture, which may bring about adaptive results. 目的：本研究欲了解人们所遭遇到的环境极端性高低与个人所拥有的 社会资源的多少，二者如何交织影响人们对整体情况的控制感以及控制感又如 何引发不同的共享内隐信念，共享内隐信念如何引发不同的应对方式和行为。 方法：在实验中使用情景故事进行操纵事件严重性和所拥有资源的多寡。结果： 除了严重性和资源多寡存在主效应外，在伤势好转可能性的事情比较分析上也 出现了预期的结果。在半身不遂极端的情况下，人脉资源多的被试认为伤者伤 势好转的可能性显著高于人脉不佳者，而在感冒（非极端）情况下，人脉好坏 则无显著效果。结论：可协商命运观是中国文化下的优势命运观，它可能带来 适应性结果。
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.35534/pc.0207038
• Cite: 方作之，常保瑞．共享内隐命运观的形成机制及后果的实验研究［J］．中国心理学前沿，2020，2（7）：547-565．
  https://doi.org/10.35534/pc.0207038