Abstract:
Objective: To revise the parenting style questionnaire to make its factors comprehensive, fewer
questions, more suitable for research on parenting style. Methods: A random sampling method was used
to select undergraduates from Kunming University of Science and Technology and Southwest Forestry
University as research objects. 500 questionnaires on parenting style and 500 questionnaires on selfrating
depression scale were sent out, and 462 questionnaires were collected with a recovery rate of 92.4%for each questionnaire. Among them, there were 410 valid questionnaires, and the recovery rate of valid
questionnaires was 89%. Considering that the large number of questions may adversely affect the data
quality, on the basis of ensuring the reliability and validity of EMBU questionnaire, EMBU is revised
to simplify the items, and only the items with large contributions from each dimension are selected for
investigation. Results: Confirmatory factor analysis found that the fitting indexes CFI, NFI and IFI of the
simplified EMBU questionnaire were all up to the standard, and the model was well adapted and valid.
With depression as the criterion, it was found that the scores of five dimensions of EMBU questionnaire
were positively correlated with the standard score of depression (r= 0.12-0.34, p<0.01), and negatively
correlated with the standard score of depression (r=-0.39, p<0.01). p< 0.01);The scores of the four
dimensions of the simplified EMBU questionnaire were positively correlated with the standard score of
depression (r= 0.19-0.33, p<0.01), while the scores of the father’s emotional warmth and understanding
were negatively correlated with the standard score of depression (r=-0.38, p<0.01).The scores of the three
dimensions of EMBU questionnaire were positively correlated with the standard score of depression (R =
0.30-0.39, p<0.01), and the scores of mother’s preference was positively correlated with the standard score
of depression (R =0.09, p<0.05).There was a negative correlation between mother’s emotional warmth
understanding and depression standard score (r=-0.43, p<0.01).After simplification, the scores of the
three dimensions of mother’s EMBU questionnaire were positively correlated with the standard score of
depression (R = 0.15-0.35, p<0.01), while the scores of mother’s emotional warmth and understanding
were negatively correlated with the standard score of depression (r=-0.45, p<0.01).The Cronbach’s Alpha
of some dimensions of the two versions of questionnaires was not higher than 0.7, indicating good
reliability. Conclusion: The revised EMBU questionnaire has wide applicability, good reliability and
validity, and provides an effective measurement tool for future research.
目的:对父母教养方式问卷进行修编,使其各因子全面,题项减少,更适用于父母教养方式相关研究。方法:
采用随机抽样的方法,抽取昆明理工大学和西南林业大学本科生作为研究对象,发出父母教养方式问卷及
抑郁自评量表各500 份,各收回462 份,各个问卷回收率92.4%;其中有效问卷各有410 份,有效问卷的
回收率89%。考虑到题量过大,可能会对数据质量带来不利影响,在保证EMBU 问卷信效度基础上,对
EMBU 进行修订,简化条目,仅选择各维度贡献大的条目用于调查。结果:验证性因子分析发现,简化后的
父亲及母亲EMBU 问卷的拟合指标CFI、NFI、IFI 均达到标准,模型适配尚佳,效度尚佳。以抑郁为效标发
现,简化前父亲EMBU 问卷的5 个维度父亲惩罚严厉、父亲过分干涉、父亲偏爱、父亲拒绝否认、父亲过度
保护得分均与抑郁标准分均呈正相关(r=0.12—0.34,p<0.01),父亲情感温暖理解与抑郁标准分均呈负相
关(r=-0.39,p<0.01);简化后父亲EMBU 问卷的4 个维度父亲惩罚严厉、父亲过分干涉、父亲拒绝否认、
父亲过度保护得分均与抑郁标准分均呈正相关(r=0.19—0.33,p<0.01),父亲情感温暖理解与抑郁标准分
均呈负相关(r=-0.38,p<0.01)。简化前母亲EMBU 问卷的3 个维度母亲惩罚严厉、母亲过分干涉过分保
护、母亲拒绝否认、得分均与抑郁标准分均呈正相关(r=0.30—0.39,p<0.01),母亲偏爱与抑郁标准分呈
正相关(r=0.09,p<0.05),母亲情感温暖理解与抑郁标准分均呈负相关(r=-0.43,p<0.01);简化后母
亲EMBU 问卷的3 个维度母亲过分干涉过分保护、母亲拒绝否认、母亲惩罚严厉得分均与抑郁标准分均呈正
相关(r=0.15—0.35,p<0.01),母亲情感温暖理解与抑郁标准分均呈负相关(r=-0.45,p<0.01)。两版
本问卷部分维度Cronbach’s Alpha 尚未高于0.7,信度尚可。结论:修订后的EMBU 问卷有广泛的适用性,
信效度尚佳,为以后的研究提供了一个有效的测量工具。