Keywords:
Academic Problem Behavior; Scale; Reliability; Validity; Adolescent
学业问题行为;量表;信度;效度;青少年
Abstract:
Objective: To establish a scale used for teacher to assess adolescents’ academic problem
behavior, and to test its Reliability and validity. Methods: Taking three domains of executive function
(cognitive flexibility, working memory, inhibition control) as theoretical models, based on sibley’s scale
and research of domestic scholars on academic problem Behavior, the Adolescents’ Academic Problem
Behavior Checklists(AAPBC) was constructed, and 783 middle school students randomly chosed were
assessed by class teachers. Results: The two-factor structure of AAPBC was established by exploratory
factor analysis, which would explain 75.30% of the total variance; the confirmatory factor analysis shows
that the data fit the model reasonably(χ2
/df=3.356,GFI=0.856,CFI=0.942,RMSEA=0.078);the
Cronbach’s alpha of the total scale and two factors is 0.947~0.972; the split-half reliability was 0.928~0.955;
the rater reliability was 0.842~0.872; the retest reliability was 0.627~0.727; the correlation between the
total scale and two factors is 0.810~0.971, and the correlation between AAPBC and the final grade is0.323~-0.381 (p<0.001).Conclusion: AAPBC(For Teacher) has good validity and reliability.
目的:编制用于教师评定的青少年学业问题行为清单,并检验其信度和效度。方法:以执行功能的三个领域(认知灵活性、工作记忆、抑制控制)为理论模型,参照 Sibley 以 ADHD 青少年为对象而编制的量表以及国内学者对学业问题行为的研究,编制青少年学业问题行为清单。分三次采用随机抽样由班主任对 783 名中学生(初一、初二、高一、高二)进行评定。结果:经探索性因子分析确立“青少年学业问题行为清单(教师用)”的二因子结构,总方差解释率为 75.30%;验证性因子分析表明数据与模型拟合较为合理(χ2/df=3.356,
GFI=0.856,CFI=0.942,RMSEA=0.078);总量表与两个因子的克朗巴赫 α 为 0.947 ~ 0.972,分半信度为 0.928 ~ 0.955、评分者信度为 0.842 ~ 0.872、重测信度为 0.627 ~ 0.727;总量表与二个因子之间的相关为 0.810、0.971,三者与期末成绩之间的相关为 -0.323 ~ -0.381(p<0.001)。结论:青少年学业问题行为清单(教师用)具有较好的信度和效度。