Keywords:
Disabled groups; Stereotype; Semantic difference scale; Public
残障群体;刻板印象;语义差异量表;公众
Abstract:
Objectives: To develop a scale that can be used to measure explicit stereotypes of the disabled
groups and test its reliability and validity. Methods: 602 members of the general public were selected
as subjects, and the semantic difference scale of stereotypes of the disabled groups was developed by
the free association method and semantic difference scale. The collected data were analyzed by item
analysis, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and reliability analysis to form the
final questionnaire. Results: There were 25 items on the scale, including warmth and competence. The
results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that the model fit well (χ2/df=2.99, RMSEA=0.08, IFI=0.82,
GFI=0.85, CFI=0.82, NFI=0.75). The split-half reliability of the total scale was 0.81, and the internal
consistency reliability was 0.90. The split-half reliability of the subscale was 0.77 and 0.85, and the internal
consistency reliability was 0.84 and 0.85. Conclusions: The semantic difference scale of stereotypes of the
disabled groups has good reliability and validity, and can be used as a tool to measure explicit stereotypes
of the disabled groups.
目的:编制出能够用来测量残障群体外显刻板印象的量表并检验其信效度。方法:以602 名普通公众为被
试,通过自由联想法和语义差异量表法,编制残障群体刻板印象语义差异量表。对收集到的数据进行项目
分析、探索性因子分析、验证性因子分析以及信度分析,形成最终问卷。结果:残障群体刻板印象语义差
异量表包括温情和能力两个维度,共25 个题目。验证性因子分析结果表明模型拟合良好(χ2/df=2.99,
RMSEA=0.08,IFI=0.82,GFI=0.85,CFI=0.82,NFI=0.75)。总量表的分半信度为0.81,内部一致性信
度为0.90;分量表的分半信度为0.77、0.85,内部一致性信度为0.84、0.85。结论:结残障群体刻板印象
语义差异量表具有良好的信效度,能够作为测量残障群体外显刻板印象的工具。