Abstract:
Objective: To explore the influence of different encoding methods and different category words
on recognition of conjunctions. Methods: 66 college students were recruited as subjects, using the three
bond reaction paradigm of connectiveness recognition, and using 3 (category types: human word pair,
animal word pair, nonbiological word pair) × 2 (coding mode: intentional coding, unintentional coding)
mixed experimental design. Results: (1) The correct rate of nonbiological word pairs was significantly
higher than that of human and animal word pairs, and the reaction time was the shortest; (2) The score
of connexion recognition of intentional encoding was significantly higher than that of unintentional
encoding, but there was no significant difference in reaction time; (3) The edge of interaction effect
of the two independent variables is significant. The accuracy of nonbiological word pair association
memory under intentional encoding level is significantly higher than that of human word pair association
recognition under unintentional encoding level, and the reaction time is not significant. Conclusion:
The processing mechanisms of associative memory and item memory are inconsistent, individuals
can recognize non biological word pairs more quickly and accurately, and the complexity and neural
mechanism of information processing differences deserve further study.
目的:探讨不同编码方式与不同范畴类型词对联结再认的影响。方法:招募66名在校大学生为被试,使用联结再认三键反应范式,采用3(范畴类型:人类词对、动物词对、非生物词对)×2(编码方式:有意编码、无意编码)混合实验设计。结果:(1)无论在哪种编码方式下,非生物词对的正确率显著高于人类和动物词对,反应时也最短;(2)有意编码的联结再认成绩都显著高于无意编码,但反应时没有表现出显著差异;(3)两个自变量交互效应边缘显著,有意编码水平下非生物词对联结记忆正确率显著高于无意编码水平下人类词对联结再认,反应时不显著。结论:说明联结记忆与项目记忆的加工机制不一致性,个体能更快、更准确地对非生物词对进行再认,其信息加工差异的复杂性和神经机制值得进一步研究。