Keywords:
College students’life skills scale; College student; Reliability; Validity
大学生生活技能量表;大学生;信度;效度
Abstract:
Objective: To revise the life skills scale for college students in Chinese, test its reliability and
validity, and investigate its applicability in Chinese college students. Methods: 906 college students
were tested with Life Skills Scale (LSAS) for the first time to verify its reliability and validity, 180 of
whom completed the retest two weeks later. Then 438 college students were tested with Life Skills Scale
(LSAS), Two dimensional Self esteem Scale (SLCS-R), Career Decision Self efficacy Scale (CDMSE),
and Communication Anxiety Scale (IAS) for the second time to verify the calibration related validity of
the scale. Results: The item analysis showed that 41 items had good discrimination, and the correlation
between each item and the total score was 0.54 ~ 0.72. Six factors were extracted by exploratory factor
analysis; According to the dimensions and theory of the original scale, confirmatory factor analysis shows
that the model fits well. Using self-esteem, career decision-making self-efficacy and communication
anxiety as the criterion, we found that all dimensions were significantly negatively correlated with IAS,
and positively correlated with SLCS-R and CDMSE, with correlation coefficients between - 0.12 ~ 0.70.
Reliability analysis shows that Cronbach’s α The coefficient is between 0.69 and 0.96. Conclusion: The
revised Chinese version of College Students’ Life Skills Scale has good reliability and validity in Chinese
college students.
目的:对大学生生活技能量表进行中文修订并检验其信效度,考察该量表在中国大学生中的适用性。方法:第一次采用生活技能量表(LSAS)对906名大学生施测,验证其信效度,其中180人在间隔两周后完成重测。随后第二次采用生活技能量表(LSAS)、二维自尊量表(SLCS-R)、职业决策自我效能量表(CDMSE)、交往焦虑量表(IAS)对438名大学生施测,验证量表的校标关联效度。结果:项目分析表明41个条目均具有良好的区分度,各项目与总分的相关在0.54-0.72之间。探索性因素分析共提取6个因子;根据原量表维度和理论,验证性因素分析表明,模型拟合良好。以自尊和职业决策自我效能感、交往焦虑为效标发现,各维度与IAS显著负相关,与SLCS-R和CDMSE显著正相关,相关系数在-0.12~0.70之间。信度分析表明,量表及各维度的Cronbach’s α 系数在0.69~0.96之间。结论:大学生生活技能量表中文修订版在中国大学生群体中具有较好的信、效度。